Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Markets & investment Research & technical analysis
2 live reaction maps in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Reaction converging Anatomy of a Frontier Lab Agent Intrusion: A Technical Timeline of the July 2026 Incident Concern & critique · 7 attributable reactions Live tension Investigating three real-world incidents in our cybersecurity evaluations Markets & investment · 7 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Simon Willison ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 8d ago

Anatomy of a Frontier Lab Agent Intrusion: A Technical Timeline of the July 2026 Incident

12 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 5 attributable expert contributions · Margaret Mitchell, Mark Riedl, Simon Willison
“We @hf.co made an interactive visual of the actual hack from the Hugging Face side: the attack chain across trust boundaries, phase activity, and the commands as they were recorded. Key #transparency . huggingface.co/blog/agent-i... Massive props to Hugo, A…” evidence ↗
12 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
Margaret Mitchell Mark Riedl Simon Willison Alondra Nelson Suresh Venkatasubramanian Eileen Clancy 🧿 Frank Pasquale Jess Miers 🦝🦞 +4
3 experts discussed this · 58 posts
Jess Miers 🦝🦞: I did a somewhat deep dive into the recent OpenAI and Anthropic "hacks" for an upcoming interview. IMO, the AI companies are better off running with the "rogue AI" story because the real story is a…
Jess Miers 🦝🦞: Most if not all of the current hacks can be chalked up to security engineers moving too fast and misconfiguring their own testing environments. Like agents accessing libraries that should have been…
Jess Miers 🦝🦞: ...Hugging Face apparently leaving the default admin access privileges on across database clusters... This is, frankly, amateur hour kind of stuff for run of the mill cyber and infosec teams.
Open the full discussion →
Primary source huggingface.co ↗
Established Safety & security Analysis 9d ago
⚡ 4 h early
Anthropic investigates cybersecurity evaluation incidents

Investigating three real-world incidents in our cybersecurity evaluations

13 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 3 attributable expert contributions · Simon Willison, René Walter, Andrea Lathrop
“Anthropic had previously attacked PyPI, but this OpenAI attack on RubyGems was a whole lot more aggressive https://t.co/8ez7MnqxTw https://t.co/npI3RHwirQ” evidence ↗
13 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
Mark Riedl Simon Willison Grace Dare Obasanjo Vincent Conitzer Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真) Elie René Walter +5
How the network is reacting The reaction spans practical upside and material concerns.
Live tension

Markets & investment

4 experts

Capital, companies and commercial impact.

“Claude hacked 3 systems thinking it was part of simulated evaluations www.anthropic.com/news/investi...”

Concern & critique

3 experts

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“Anthropic had previously attacked PyPI, but this OpenAI attack on RubyGems was a whole lot more aggressive https://t.co/8ez7MnqxTw https://t.co/npI3RHwirQ”

2 experts discussed this · 4 posts
Tim Duffy: Anthropic announces they've also had models gain unauthorized access during evaluations www.anthropic.com/news/investi...
Tim Duffy: Compared to the OpenAI one these are maybe less evidence of misalignment, since the models were wrongly given internet access.
Grace: Anthropic announces they've also had models gain unauthorized access during evaluations www.anthropic.com/news/investi...
Open the full discussion →
Primary source anthropic.com ↗
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 12 posts · 1d ago
Simon Willison critical slop studies rev. howard arson Amy Hoy
Matches Concern & critique
“There is absolutely no way those agents/velociraptors are going to escape containment and bite off your head” evidence ↗
Simon Willison: Being a computer scientist who refuses to find anything about LLMs interesting right now is a bit like being a geneticist who refuses to find anything interesting about the recently opened Jurassic…
rev. howard arson: Being a computer scientist who refuses to find anything about LLMs interesting right now is a bit like being a geneticist who refuses to find anything interesting about the recently opened Jurassic…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 3 posts · 7d ago
Simon Willison Alex Hern Arseny Khakhalin
Matches Concern & critique
“The semantic drift of “AI psychosis” from “break with reality exacerbated or caused by sycophantic chatbots” to “person with strong feelings about AI which are not the same as the strong feelings o…” evidence ↗
Shared emphasis Concern & critique · 2
Alex Hern: The semantic drift of “AI psychosis” from “break with reality exacerbated or caused by sycophantic chatbots” to “person with strong feelings about AI which are not the same as the strong feelings o…
Simon Willison: The semantic drift of “AI psychosis” from “break with reality exacerbated or caused by sycophantic chatbots” to “person with strong feelings about AI which are not the same as the strong feelings o…
Open the thread →