Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Pavel ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Analysis 6d ago
⚡ 793 h early
critical AI essay olivia science

Critical AI

5 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

5 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“"AI literacy" is like "cigarette literacy" explaining how to light up with swagger. What we need is critical AI literacy (see olivia.science/ai/ from @olivia.science), which is a completely different curriculum. One that is liberating.”

Research & technical analysis

1 expert

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“@olivia.science of course has a great collection including a lot of her own research olivia.science/ai/”

4 experts discussed this · 46 posts
Olivia Guest: I think being anti AI is entering a more mainstream phase! While incredibly good at the same time we're finally meeting a low bar. This means: 1) more critical thinking is needed now as non-experts…
Olivia Guest: 2) industry buys people out a great deal and conflicts of interest are often not properly displayed. Many already have started rebranding as AI literacy and even critical AI literacy "experts" — wh…
Olivia Guest: Obviously, when you see research that involves anything to do with AI, look up what side projects these people have, what startups they spun up, & sadly if they are in the Epstein files, etc. bsky.…
Open the full discussion →
Established Models & releases Analysis 8d ago
⚡ 483 h early
Amnesty International generative AI human rights report

Unlawful by design: Exposing the human rights costs of generative AI - Amnesty International

11 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

11 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Policy & governance

2 experts

Rules, institutions and accountability.

“"Amnesty International finds that standalone generative AI systems, based on unlawful web scraping, depend on mass invasions of privacy by design, and are fundamentally incompatible with international human rights law."”

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“> Without significant changes to how these systems are developed and deployed, they will continue to undermine international human rights laws and standards. www. amnesty.org/en/documents/pol40/0996/2026/en/ This is a pretty good report overall. Hard to dis…”

2 experts discussed this · 6 posts
James Grimmelmann: I know people who do a shitload of web scraping without the consent of the people whose servers and personal data are being scraped. And do you know why they do it? To document human rights violati…
James Grimmelmann: I’m sorry, but “unlawful web scraping” is not itself a human rights violation unless you have a view of either property rights or privacy rights that is itself incompatible with the human right to …
Adverb: I’m sorry, but “unlawful web scraping” is not itself a human rights violation unless you have a view of either property rights or privacy rights that is itself incompatible with the human right to …
Open the full discussion →
Established Models & releases Signal 18d ago

Anthropic recorded net loss over billion first half this year wsj reports

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
2 experts discussed this · 3 posts
Pavel: Few remember the ancient bygone days of spring 2026, when we were reliably told by leading technology brothers that Anthropic was actually profitable (because Anthropic had said so and only stupid …
Teresa Heffernan: Few remember the ancient bygone days of spring 2026, when we were reliably told by leading technology brothers that Anthropic was actually profitable (because Anthropic had said so and only stupid …
Luis Villa: These numbers are for 2025, before Claude Code’s rocket launch? So the two are not contradictory?
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 3 posts · 15d ago
Pavel: "AI will destroy humanity" has always and only been an attempt to distract from "AI will leak your login credentials to the internet"
Emily Bell: Exactly …’you might want to buy a wind up radio because the Internet will be offline frequently in the coming months…and get some cash as Applepay won’t work’ just less appealing as a PR statement …
Open the thread →
2 experts · 4 posts · 20d ago
Pavel: Access to hormones needs to be regulated, nowadays any kid can walk into the corner store and buy as many e cigarettes as they like
Pavel: Sincerely hoping that no one's shitty AI assistant picks this up as a serious post
Open the thread →
2 experts · 3 posts · 13d ago
tweety fish: one of the interesting things--hey I should write about this at length--about all this nonsense is the way that it's revealing how many people (including many bosses) have a weird/stupid/bad idea o…
tweety fish: like if you think of "managing people" as comprising only "you tell people what to do and if they do a bad job you yell at them or fire them", boy you're turbo-fucked, and that is weirdly applicabl…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 3 posts · 13d ago
alanau.bsky.social: This reminds me a lot of the hype around data science about 10 years ago. It's basically corporate FOMO, which is a sign of weak management.
Pavel: What do you mean we can't just tell our people "add AI to this" and magically 10x profit
Open the thread →