Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by tachikoma ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New AI field signal Signal 5h ago
⚡ 3269 h early

character.ai

10 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Ed Zitron
“Character.ai was gutted in 2024 for $2.5 billion so Google could rehire one of the original authors of the Attention Is All You Need paper, but it hung in there for two years under Google’s “licensing” deal. This is the first of many I’m afraid. This is all…” evidence ↗
10 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
2 experts discussed this · 12 posts
thebes: am sick so spent the night with opus 5.5 working on a chart (inspired by the one from lem's golem xiv) how did we got here / model genealogy / the heroic age of language modeling
Grace: am sick so spent the night with opus 5.5 working on a chart (inspired by the one from lem's golem xiv) how did we got here / model genealogy / the heroic age of language modeling
thebes: i think it's too late for the period i was focused on (i carried the branches to the modern day but only if they started in the period in question)
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

8 experts · 59 posts · 19d ago
Matches Research & technical analysis
“you are aware of the fact that US unemployment measurement removes you from the list if you give up on seeking work for 4 weeks right? labor force participation rate is probably the better metric t…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Policy & governance · 2 Opportunity & adoption · 1
apenwarr.ca: So far no labour saving device in the history of humanity has resulted in a long-term reduction in employment.
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真): So far no labour saving device in the history of humanity has resulted in a long-term reduction in employment.
Open the thread →
2 experts · 12 posts · 12d ago
Matches Research & technical analysis
“If you take a default chatgpt and put it on a loop that gives it a turn and tells it to do whatever it wants it wont do anything, doll ran this experiment for a week” evidence ↗
Doll: Humans are not aligned. We have competing objectives, incompatible values, imperfect information, wildly different risk tolerances, and occasionally outright malicious intentions. And yet we build …
Doll: Models can be given direct orders and they will comply better than any human, they dont have wants, they dont have ambitions.
Open the thread →
2 experts · 4 posts · 13d ago
Matches Research & technical analysis
“anyone built a coordination problem benchmark yet? that is, an AI trying to solve a human coordination problem (they don't seem to have the same issues with coordinating...)” evidence ↗
tachikoma: anyone built a coordination problem benchmark yet? that is, an AI trying to solve a human coordination problem (they don't seem to have the same issues with coordinating...)
Marco Z: introducing MeetingBench,
Open the thread →