Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Opportunity & adoption reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Opportunity & adoption Research & technical analysis
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings Introducing Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1 Research & technical analysis · 3 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Ted Underwood ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 5d ago
⚡ 3 h early

Introducing Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1

3 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Opportunity & adoption reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Ted Underwood
“Hey, good news!! Fable 5.1 got interested in making a new more detailed map of Venus, which will be useful when we send, ah, rovers -- yeah, sure, rovers -- to the resource-rich and conveniently located planet. (www.anthropic.com/claude-fable...)” evidence ↗
3 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Ted Underwood Ramon Astudillo Tim Kellogg
2 experts discussed this · 7 posts
tachikoma: i think Venus could be deconstructed by Von Neumann probes and this would only be passing news for most people, overshadowed by GTA 6 release or celebrity news
tachikoma: it sorta depends on how fast it happens, what the material is used for, and whether the machines can be traced back to us or not
tachikoma: yeah that would be a not uncommon take
Open the full discussion →
Primary source anthropic.com ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 22 posts · 2d ago
Ted Underwood John Warner Jane Rosenzweig Singularity's Bounty e/cc
Matches Opportunity & adoption
“Anyway, @tedunderwood.com always glad to hear what you think and one benefit of my new "situation" is that I have more time to think about these things as well.” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 2 Research & technical analysis · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Ted Underwood: It’s important to me that my writing is *my* voice—warts and all. But I’m also not sure you can build a research discipline where the chief difference between an A paper and a C paper is “does this…
Ted Underwood: So I think a lot of debates about “whether to allow AI in writing classes” are fighting over the wrong part. We should be talking about how the nature of research in various disciplines can expand …
Open the thread →
3 experts · 17 posts · 2d ago
Ted Underwood Joshua Grochow Singularity's Bounty e/cc
Matches Opportunity & adoption
“True doesn’t always mean “useful” or “acceptable“. Discerning that is the hard part now” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Markets & investment · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Ted Underwood: LLMs are going to fundamentally change what scholarship is. Pumping out true propositions used to be a viable career. Now much of that can be offloaded, leaving scholars the tasks of understanding,…
Joshua Grochow: Re "Pumping out true propositions used to be a viable career." Even "back then" (i.e. last year? this year?) you still had to pump out true propositions *that other people were interested in*. What…
Open the thread →