Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Context & explanation reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Context & explanation Questions & unknowns
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Reaction converging Hugging face model evaluation security incident Concern & critique · 5 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Tim Kellogg ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Evaluation & benchmarks Signal 6d ago
⚡ 1 h early

Hugging face model evaluation security incident

18 experts across 6 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Context & explanation reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Grace
“This headline is extremely funny given what happened (OpenAI hacked HF by accident) openai.com/index/huggin...” evidence ↗
18 experts 6 communities 1 sources clustered
Ethan Mollick Thomas Steinke Mor Naaman Tim Kellogg Djamé 🟥 Ryan Calo Grace Anna Mills +10
6 experts discussed this · 11 posts
Grace: This headline is extremely funny given what happened (OpenAI hacked HF by accident) openai.com/index/huggin...
Grace: Maybe the most concerning part is the OpenAI claim to not have known about this before investigating?
Grace: Well, I think the model passed the test
Open the full discussion →
Primary source openai.com ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 8 posts · 3d ago
Tim Kellogg jeremymorrell.dev austegard.com
Matches Context & explanation
“I think we still should have human review, but of the _shape_ of the code, not the individual lines. Have the agent provide a shape…erm shaped overview as part of the PR.” evidence ↗
Tim Kellogg: probably true there will always be a diminishing portion of software that needs to be reviewed by human, and it’ll never be zero, but right now you probably shouldn’t be reviewing code manually
Tim Kellogg: having started my career before PRs were normal, i’d say it was a combo of cargo culting the Linux project and an extension of “code review is good” but “pair programming doesn’t scale” and in that…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 5 posts · 4d ago
Tim Kellogg Matt Darling
Matches Context & explanation
“they’ll send a link to CNBC or whatever and i’ll be like, “yeah, okay so here’s some context…”” evidence ↗
Tim Kellogg: with my friends & family back home, i always lead with “oh Ed Zitron? yeah he runs a marketing firm that makes money on anti-AI sentiment” and that usually sets the tone
Matt Darling: I usually talk about what our kids are up to, but that works too.
Open the thread →