Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Building & implementation reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Building & implementation
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

5 experts · 26 posts · 1d ago
Ben Recht Clément Canonne Suresh Venkatasubramanian Dashiell Joshua Grochow
Matches Building & implementation
“No, surprisingly, Karmarkar's algorithm was immediately implementable, and the worst-case complexity constants were all pretty reasonable.” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Questions & unknowns · 2 Concern & critique · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
Clément Canonne: Of all the possibles takes on the claimed refutation of the Exponential Time Hypothesis, "it isn't a practical algorithm" is maybe the worst.
Clément Canonne: Just to be clear: there are many valid criticisms to make! But the fact that "the constant in the O(.) is big" is absurd. What's next, "most of maths is useless because real numbers don't actually …
Open the thread →
7 experts · 11 posts · 1d ago
Eugene Vinitsky Alexander Hoyle Alejandra Caraballo Colin tweety fish Mary Branscombe Matt Darling
Matches Building & implementation
“I think if the coding capabilities and agentic features had never been developed, he would've been dead on. I've had to adjust my own view multiple times. I was wrong about it because I thought LLM…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Markets & investment · 2 Research & technical analysis · 2 Building & implementation · 1
Eugene Vinitsky: You're conflating the position of extremists with the much more standard, measured take that AI will be transformative (which it already has been)
tweety fish: “Predicted fifteen of the last one stock crashes” somewhat famously does not count as being good at prediction.
Open the thread →
3 experts · 5 posts · 1d ago
Eryk Salvaggio Hagen Blix Tyler Shoemaker
Matches Building & implementation
“Come on, it's not like these guys are connected to the US military? It's not like Amodei and Altman are giving speeches about their preferred geopolitical developments to the UN, or giving huge amo…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Markets & investment · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
Hagen Blix: Yup. 💯 And now he's also selling people on the idea that, ultimately, capitalism will just solve the problem on its own. Take comfort in the market!
Hagen Blix: Come on, it's not like these guys are connected to the US military? It's not like Amodei and Altman are giving speeches about their preferred geopolitical developments to the UN, or giving huge amo…
Open the thread →