Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

6 experts · 30 posts · 1d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“@vortexegg.com has described a spectrum of "slop vs care" I find useful because it captures how most ai/LLM related problems aren't really new, but existing harms amplified in that context we can t…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Questions & unknowns · 2 Concern & critique · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
e.w. niedermeyer: AI slop is a supply side game-changer, so it's easy to focus there, but ultimately everything comes down to demand: will the public, in aggregate, be satisfied with slop or demand more? skeptics ha…
e.w. niedermeyer: covering cars you have to separate your personal taste from what the market demands, and that's hard when it comes down to something like slop restaurant menus... I find them viscerally off-putting…
Open the thread →
6 experts · 16 posts · 1d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“Even in DS9, the show itself undermines Section 31! The virus S31 infects Odo with (+other Founders) means the war will continue since no one will order the Jem Hadar to stop. But Odo/Sisko/etc Sta…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 2 Research & technical analysis · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Matt Darling: Just like @liberalcurrents.com tbh.
Luke Stark: the thing i come back to, over and over--which stuff like LOWER DECKS got, and so much other latter-day trek has forgotten--is that the whole idea of trek is that they exist in a genuinely horrifyi…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 4 posts · 19h ago
Matches Concern & critique
“A treat to see @rcalo.bsky.social’s keynote at @buceriuslaw.bsky.social yesterday—my favorite point, v aligned w my critique of #AIexceptionalism & my emphasis on the importance of political #mobil…” evidence ↗
Annette Zimmermann: A treat to see @rcalo.bsky.social’s keynote at @buceriuslaw.bsky.social yesterday—my favorite point, v aligned w my critique of #AIexceptionalism & my emphasis on the importance of political #mobil…
Annette Zimmermann: Also love the important critique of #inevitabilitynarratives in the AI space here. These are #contingent innovation trajectories, because they are functions of contingent human choices. Lawmakers w…
Open the thread →