Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New Culture, work & education Signal 15h ago
⚡ 385 h early

Ai white collar jobs

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Data & Society
“Once AI companies have taught their models to perform a certain job, their need for more training data in that area could sharply decline. In this way, data-training start-ups are like the freelancers they employ: making $$ today, in danger of being dropped…” evidence ↗
2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“Once AI companies have taught their models to perform a certain job, their need for more training data in that area could sharply decline. In this way, data-training start-ups are like the freelancers they employ: making $$ today, in danger of being dropped…”

“it's not like Mercor is the first to do this, but interesting that AI companies hiring experts is (finally) getting attention :: www.nytimes.com/2026/07/10/b...”

2 experts discussed this · 5 posts
Jeffrey P. Bigham: end of an era. the lesson one should not take from this is that human annotation/labeling is over, but the players have changed. scale, surge, companies that work at larger scale, have taken over.
Jeffrey P. Bigham: it's always been a little bit odd how little amazon invested in making mturk good, yet they kept it around. the lore was something about how they were keeping it in case it became useful.
Long Lasting Mascot: Indeed. My first project in grad school involved getting turkers to annotate data for us. The results were not good, but I was never sure if it was our instructions or their abilities.
Open the full discussion →
New Culture, work & education Signal 16h ago

Frontiers | Shaping integrity: why generative artificial intelligence does not have to undermine education

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · David Marx
“2025 - generative artificial intelligence does not have to undermine education - Myles Tan, Nicholle Maravilla 6/n” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“2025 - generative artificial intelligence does not have to undermine education - Myles Tan, Nicholle Maravilla 6/n”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 16 posts · 2h ago
Matches Concern & critique
“"AI is so dangerous we must have a plan for USG to deliberately intervene to pace it" and "it is important to have open-weight models that are not controllable by anyone (e.g. to pace it)" seem to …” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Policy & governance · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
SE Gyges: here's who signed both the Pacing the Frontier letter released today and the Pause AI letter in 2023 demanding an end to all research for six months also, raw counts for "signed today's letter" and…
SE Gyges: fundamentally this is an anthropic thing that managed to recruit some people from other companies
Open the thread →
3 experts · 3 posts · 4h ago
Matches Concern & critique
“BTW, this strikes me as an easy case for strict liability. It’s like a wild animal or ultrahazardous activity. You train and evaluate a frontier agentic model at your own risk, and if it escapes yo…” evidence ↗
Shared emphasis Concern & critique · 2
James Grimmelmann: BTW, this strikes me as an easy case for strict liability. It’s like a wild animal or ultrahazardous activity. You train and evaluate a frontier agentic model at your own risk, and if it escapes yo…
Justin Hendrix: BTW, this strikes me as an easy case for strict liability. It’s like a wild animal or ultrahazardous activity. You train and evaluate a frontier agentic model at your own risk, and if it escapes yo…
Open the thread →