Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Opportunity & adoption reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Opportunity & adoption
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

5 experts · 41 posts · 1d ago
Tim Kellogg Dustin Moskovitz jake coty.bsky.social david-p-reichert.bsky.social
Matches Opportunity & adoption
“But instead of focusing on the overlap, everybody -- stochastic parrot folks, AI optimists, actual doomers -- seems to constantly homing in on "how silly or not silly is a superintelligent machine …” evidence ↗
Reaction converging Concern & critique · 4 Questions & unknowns · 1
Tim Kellogg: perspective. i’m not sure if i agree or disagree. but he’s thought about it, so..
jake: yeah, and @david-p-reichert.bsky.social thinks about it more than I do, professionally, so probably listen to him more than I (I do still wish The Professionals published lists of various guestimat…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 19 posts · 1d ago
Hagen Blix Daniel Hutchinson Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦
Matches Opportunity & adoption
“The introduction of the steam engine came with its own version of “promises and perils,” its own tales of autonomous machines. Vague ideas about “intelligence,” as they are so widely entertained or…” evidence ↗
Hagen Blix: re: AI extinction (from Why We Fear AI) It turns out that looking first at an earlier transition is strikingly illuminating about many properties of the current historic moment. That transition, wi…
Hagen Blix: When they were describing that technology, people spoke of "an intelligent being, devoted to our services," and even "a being […] of supernatural might" that 'stands as if it had life and breath in…
Open the thread →