Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Opportunity & adoption reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Opportunity & adoption
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New Compute & infrastructure Signal 19h ago

Dwayne Monroe (@cloudquistador.eurosky.social)

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Opportunity & adoption reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Iris van Rooij
“This kind of work is useful too; i.e, educate people on how they can recognize hype and how they can seek reliable expert knowlegde mu.social/profile/clou...” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Iris van Rooij

“This kind of work is useful too; i.e, educate people on how they can recognize hype and how they can seek reliable expert knowlegde mu.social/profile/clou...”

Primary source mu.social ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

5 experts · 41 posts · 1d ago
Tim Kellogg Dustin Moskovitz jake coty.bsky.social david-p-reichert.bsky.social
Matches Opportunity & adoption
“But instead of focusing on the overlap, everybody -- stochastic parrot folks, AI optimists, actual doomers -- seems to constantly homing in on "how silly or not silly is a superintelligent machine …” evidence ↗
Reaction converging Concern & critique · 4 Questions & unknowns · 1
Tim Kellogg: perspective. i’m not sure if i agree or disagree. but he’s thought about it, so..
jake: yeah, and @david-p-reichert.bsky.social thinks about it more than I do, professionally, so probably listen to him more than I (I do still wish The Professionals published lists of various guestimat…
Open the thread →
4 experts · 17 posts · 1d ago
jake Doll Singularity's Bounty e/cc brennan
Matches Opportunity & adoption
“Faster software building means more software that wasnt worth it to build before becomes worth it to build now” evidence ↗
Shared emphasis Opportunity & adoption · 2
Doll: Faster software building means more software that wasnt worth it to build before becomes worth it to build now
Singularity's Bounty e/cc: It will be funny if the industry streamlines itself inside and outside big corporations, with smaller teams contributing more, but sales and marketing go extreme because that's the part the bots ca…
Open the thread →
4 experts · 11 posts · 1d ago
David Marx jake Amy Hoy Singularity's Bounty e/cc
Matches Opportunity & adoption
“And, yeah, that is an incredible opportunity for people getting started in the industry. Beastie wrangler” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Markets & investment · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
David Marx: Very forceful statement by Terry Tao about AI and math. terrytao.wordpress.com/2026/09/11/a... Note, he is not claiming the models aren't real and powerful. He's talking about how that power should…
jake: this is the exact same worry that people have been having in software engineering / computer science, now math, have been talking about. +what I talk to my boss (who runs a 15k-person organization)…
Open the thread →