Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Opportunity & adoption reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Accelerating AI research Development 1h ago
Anthropic researcher quits existential risk warning

The AI Researcher Who Just Quit Anthropic Says It’s ‘Crunch Time for Humanity’

5 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Opportunity & adoption reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Katie Drummond
“The great @mzeff.bsky.social has a fantastic interview with Jacob Coxon, who quit Anthropic and shared a massively viral X post about why: www.wired.com/story/anthro...” evidence ↗
5 experts 4 communities 2 sources clustered
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“It seems brave young Coxon has no insight beyond that of your average Twitter addict. But kudos to him for quitting.”

Opportunity & adoption

1 expert

New capabilities, benefits and practical upside.

“The great @mzeff.bsky.social has a fantastic interview with Jacob Coxon, who quit Anthropic and shared a massively viral X post about why: www.wired.com/story/anthro...”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

14 experts · 130 posts · 1d ago
Matches Opportunity & adoption
“💯Testing has shown they’re faster and more reliable at some languages than others” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Questions & unknowns · 4 Opportunity & adoption · 2 Concern & critique · 1
Sarah T Roberts, PhD: Try teaching college students. You won’t be quite so dismissive then.
Pwnallthethings: I think the "LLMs can't reason" stuff is mostly sophism these days. They plainly do not "reason" in the way humans do, and are certainly not always correct or good at it, but they are also doing th…
Open the thread →