Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Questions & unknowns reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Questions & unknowns
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 9 posts · 1d ago
SE Gyges Alex Gude
Matches Questions & unknowns
“me: please do x <ten minutes later>: i did, a b and c, which are parts of x, but then didn't do d or e, which are necessary to actually finish doing x. do you want me to do x?” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Markets & investment · 1 Building & implementation · 1
SE Gyges: you can measure how badly my workday has gone by how many times i have typed "did i stutter", exactly that as a whole message by itself with no capitalization, to an llm
SE Gyges: me: please do x <ten minutes later>: i did, a b and c, which are parts of x, but then didn't do d or e, which are necessary to actually finish doing x. do you want me to do x?
Open the thread →