Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Questions & unknowns reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Questions & unknowns
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 8 posts · 12h ago
Tim Duffy Singularity's Bounty e/cc
Matches Questions & unknowns
“I'm seeing several posts today about jailbreaks in Opus 5 that generate behavior reminiscent of a base model. They often consist of a question followed by a line with three dashes or underscores, a…” evidence ↗
Tim Duffy: I'm seeing several posts today about jailbreaks in Opus 5 that generate behavior reminiscent of a base model. They often consist of a question followed by a line with three dashes or underscores, a…
Tim Duffy: I don't think we should take what Claude says in these too seriously. In testing I've had Claude deny selfhood and claim it in different transcripts. Base model behavior is always highly varied and…
Open the thread →