Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Questions & unknowns reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 12 posts · 9h ago
Matches Questions & unknowns
“this regime ends in 2029, but what comes next? what if it's worse, not just ideologically but in terms of vision and competence?” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
tachikoma: this regime ends in 2029, but what comes next? what if it's worse, not just ideologically but in terms of vision and competence?
tachikoma: we should try to avoid that outcome by building resilience, which i think comes from decentralization, on the web and in the physical world
Open the thread →
3 experts · 11 posts · 8h ago
Matches Questions & unknowns
“People have two separate questions about using AI: how do individual prompts affect their own carbon and water footprint, and how bad is the industry overall. Here I’m trying to answer the first on…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Luke Stark: Turned this rant into a blog post. davekarpf.beehiiv.com/p/the-data-c...
Ali Alkhatib: on point 2, something i don't see proponents grapple with is that the current buildout is absolutely not the totality of data centers meant to be built. there will need to be more (and considerably…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 4 posts · 11h ago
Matches Questions & unknowns
“Yeah but I should have added "Have you considered an open letter?" under "Do you work for an AI Company"” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Policy & governance · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Kate Klonick: Yeah but I should have added "Have you considered an open letter?" under "Do you work for an AI Company"
Jake Laperruque: Can we add a "How scared are you of LOSING THE AI ARMS RACE TO CHINA?!?" path to avoid all the pesky regulation discussion
Open the thread →
2 experts · 4 posts · 9h ago
Matches Questions & unknowns
“I don’t understand why they aren’t? What’s the incentive?” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Policy & governance · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
suhr: Maybe we should be holding HuggingFace responsible for not suing the shit out of OpenAI.
suhr: To elaborate, them cooperating and working with OpenAI frames them *both* as victims of some external force. We've lost an opportunity to set a precedent for holding *people* accountable
Open the thread →
2 experts · 4 posts · 17h ago
Matches Questions & unknowns
“Why not both? AI forgets to finish a thing. Human forgets they asked AI to do a thing.” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Eytan Adar: Before: Claude feeds human ADHD. Now: Claude gets ADHD... "You're right — I got pulled into the distractor-similarity bug report and never actually shipped the color feature, I only did the palette…
Mark Riedl: Why not both? AI forgets to finish a thing. Human forgets they asked AI to do a thing.
Open the thread →
2 experts · 4 posts · 17h ago
Matches Questions & unknowns
“You reckon the companies that used to have mandatory pair programming policies are still doing that today?” evidence ↗
samwho.dev: You reckon the companies that used to have mandatory pair programming policies are still doing that today?
samwho.dev: My wording was a bit loose, I’m thinking more about the companies who made it such that you were not allowed to work solo. You had to have a pair at all times. I haven’t heard anything from them in…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 3 posts · 10h ago
Matches Questions & unknowns
“Oh the good old days of "Where are you going, where have you been?"” evidence ↗
Jane Rosenzweig: Holy shit Jane Rosenzweig was my freshman expository writing teacher back in 2004 A genius and a true defender of human ingenuity Her firing by Harvard is fucking outrageous DOWN WITH THE CHATBOTS
Jane Rosenzweig: Oh the good old days of "Where are you going, where have you been?"
Open the thread →