“Melbourne Australia where I hire?” evidence ↗
The Who's Who of AI
What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.
Showing developments with attributable Questions & unknowns reactions.
See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.
Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.
No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.
The questions experts are actively pulling apart
One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.
No developments match these filters yet.
Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.
Clear filtersWhat experts are discussing without an anchoring article
“There's no question that they've aggressively distilled.” evidence ↗
“the hallucinations caused by the specific mushroom in question are not culturally dependent, you have no context for it and still end up with the same hallucinations” evidence ↗
“me: please do x <ten minutes later>: i did, a b and c, which are parts of x, but then didn't do d or e, which are necessary to actually finish doing x. do you want me to do x?” evidence ↗
“Sample like 15% or 30% and check where the words are mentioned?” evidence ↗
“Someone very confidently said I would never be conscious, and I said "Well why?" and they said "Because it doesn't have phenomenal experience, we know that" and then described how it doesn't have d…” evidence ↗