Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Research & technical analysis
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

5 experts · 13 posts · 23h ago
Ted Underwood Andrew Perfors Andrew Piper Meredith Martin D. Hicks
Matches Research & technical analysis
“Some of the high schoolers in wealthier suburbs here have decided cold emailing UC faculty for "research opportunities" is a great way to get into Berkeley” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1 Context & explanation · 1
Ted Underwood: We need a social movement to explain to students and entrepreneurs — that it's a bad idea to email random professors in other states for advice. It was charming to get one inquiry a month, but thre…
Ted Underwood: I'm not sure what happened; GenAI is part of it, but not all of it. The trend began earlier.
Open the thread →
3 experts · 9 posts · 1d ago
Dan Greene tweety fish Isaiah Bishop
Matches Research & technical analysis
“have they laid off 25% of the research staff? does collaborate mean more than assist, or is this symptomatic of their troubled relationship with words?” evidence ↗
Isaiah Bishop: i adore the kind of meaningless chart anthropic can put out
Isaiah Bishop: have they laid off 25% of the research staff? does collaborate mean more than assist, or is this symptomatic of their troubled relationship with words?
Open the thread →
2 experts · 6 posts · 1d ago
SE Gyges Colin
Matches Research & technical analysis
“In particular what I would not say if you asked me a week ago is, “no that is impossible because no one, man or machine, could possibly change how a language model behaves by editing its weights”” evidence ↗
SE Gyges: this is an insanely funny admission given that the post is still correct in terms of all of the literal words that are literally in the post
Colin: there's just nothing really to address. The math performance thing on the small Qwen model is just a programming task. A kind of strange one, but not an especially impossible one. It doesn't reveal…
Open the thread →