Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Clear
Showing signals surfaced by Abstract Tesseract ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; expert reactions remain attributable.

Established AI research Research 4d ago
⚡ 614 h early
AI theoretical tool cognitive science paper

Reclaiming AI as a Theoretical Tool for Cognitive Science - Computational Brain & Behavior

4 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

4 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“This does not follow. Computationalism does not even imply makeism. See 📝 link.springer.com/article/10.1... See 🧵 bsky.app/profile/iris...”

“One paper I thought a lot while writing was this by @irisvanrooij.bsky.social et al (linked in my piece; I recommend). There's a role for AI for "assessing whether something is computationally possible or not, in principle and in practice." link.springer.co…”

6 experts discussed this · 119 posts
Iris van Rooij: What, in your opinion, is the strongest anti-computationalist argument out there?
Iris van Rooij: Here, by 'computationalism' I mean the metatheoretical thesis that cognition is, or can be understood as, a form of computation. See eg link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Iris van Rooij: Was not rhetorical, but I wonder if question was understood? bsky.app/profile/iris...
Open the full discussion →
Established AI field signal Analysis 4d ago
⚡ 80 h early
Jacobin AI propaganda critique essay

A Castle Made of Legos – On Jacobin and AI Propaganda

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

2 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered

“To this, I will add, as another example, the allegedly leftist publication Jacobin, the very heart of entryism regarding 'AI' and many other things: vdgasjournal.com/2025/07/24/a...”

2 experts discussed this · 2 posts
Dwayne Monroe: To this, I will add, as another example, the allegedly leftist publication Jacobin, the very heart of entryism regarding 'AI' and many other things: vdgasjournal.com/2025/07/24/a...
Anthony Moser: what they need is some exitism
Abstract Tesseract: To this, I will add, as another example, the allegedly leftist publication Jacobin, the very heart of entryism regarding 'AI' and many other things: vdgasjournal.com/2025/07/24/a...
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

Casey Fiesler on why LLMs don't really cite their sources

6 experts · 30 posts · 5d ago
Casey Fiesler: Particularly in the context of (appropriate) crackdowns on LLM-generated papers (e.g., on arXiv) and more and more tales of fabricated citations, two reminders: (1) LLMs do not "cite their sources"…
Casey Fiesler: A common comment on my videos about LLM "hallucinations" is that this isn't as much of a problem because LLMs "cite their sources" now. This is a category error. Citing a source implies it was cons…
Open the thread →
5 experts · 8 posts · 23h ago
Timnit Gebru: You gotta hand it to OpenAI, billing this as a *partnership* between OpenAI & Hugging Face when what actually happened was Hugging Face finding out that OpenAI was using a bunch of bots to exploit …
Timnit Gebru: Reading that whole OpenAI post describing them unleashing a bunch of bots on Hugging Face as an "unprecedented cyber incident," is a master class in marketing. Lol and branding what happened as Ope…
Open the thread →