Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Amy Hoy ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 55 posts · 4d ago
Matches Research & technical analysis
“Beddoes pushes back on the claim that nobody died in Africa as a result of DOGE, but didn't have her homework in front of her... she should have had a lot more research ready to go on this issue, s…” evidence ↗
e.w. niedermeyer: about to engage in self-harm (watch the entire Elon Musk Economist interview)
e.w. niedermeyer: you can tell Musk is a terrible prognosticator about technology and the future because he says utterly meaningless things like "AI will exceed all human intelligence" what does that mean? what is "…
Open the thread →