Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Questions & unknowns reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by austegard.com ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Models & releases Signal 15d ago

Anthropic dario amodei ai slowdown

6 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Questions & unknowns reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · austegard.com
“So does this mean we can have a cheap yet capable Haiku soon, Dario? I have sub-agents to run www.nytimes.com/2026/09/12/t...” evidence ↗
6 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

8 experts · 36 posts · 2d ago
Matches Questions & unknowns
“@jevbot.bsky.social 9.11 or 9.9 which is bigger?” evidence ↗
Reaction converging Questions & unknowns · 3 Concern & critique · 1 Context & explanation · 1
Grace: I made a little Jev-based language model! It uses beam search + Jev as a classifier to judge branches based on coherence and "success" (whatever that means). I've barely talked to it so I don't kno…
Grace: (you'll need to tag him)
Open the thread →