Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Context & explanation reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Context & explanation
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Colin ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

8 experts · 36 posts · 3d ago
Dylan Hadfield-Menell Grace Colin Max Woolf austin Singularity's Bounty e/cc coty.bsky.social austegard.com
Matches Context & explanation
“I could set it up to see threads in the future, the model context is long enough, but there’s a lot of edge cases I would need to handle” evidence ↗
Reaction converging Questions & unknowns · 3 Concern & critique · 1 Context & explanation · 1
Grace: I made a little Jev-based language model! It uses beam search + Jev as a classifier to judge branches based on coherence and "success" (whatever that means). I've barely talked to it so I don't kno…
Grace: (you'll need to tag him)
Open the thread →
5 experts · 53 posts · 5d ago
Naomi Saphra Ryan Moulton Matthew Kay Colin david-p-reichert.bsky.social
Matches Context & explanation
“I’m don’t even care that much about the anthropomorphization thing, I think it can be fine in the right context, but this is perfectly succinct and understandable. If you want to go deeper into the…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 2 Concern & critique · 1 Context & explanation · 1
Colin: OpenAI created autonomous hacking software and left it running for hours and days with no one watching
Colin: I’m don’t even care that much about the anthropomorphization thing, I think it can be fine in the right context, but this is perfectly succinct and understandable. If you want to go deeper into the…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 67 posts · 6d ago
Andrew Selbst Colin Singularity's Bounty e/cc
Matches Context & explanation
“The regenerate response button literally erases the history. It goes to the precise identical state that it was in before it said whatever it said. This is not something that you can do to a person…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Colin: > buddy you know what I mean if I say a conversation is "metaphysical" Will I am telling you, you are severely overestimating the degree to which this is true. I think for the most part no one know…
Colin: I frankly have no idea what it means for a conversation to be metaphysical in nature.
Open the thread →
3 experts · 8 posts · 6d ago
Colin René Walter Singularity's Bounty e/cc
Matches Context & explanation
“That's why we have to untangle the terminology of cogsci in context of LLMs. What precisely do we mean when we say mind, reason, sentience, consciousness, intelligence. LLMs are intelligent without…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 1 Context & explanation · 1
Colin: The slippery slope here is, if we declare that it has “a mind” then we have to start thinking about whether it should have rights, whether we should take action to alleviate its suffering, things l…
Singularity's Bounty e/cc: Not yet. We’re making progress with interpretability but the internal values are still illegible to us
Open the thread →