Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Research & technical analysis
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Reaction converging fion.ac Research & technical analysis · 3 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Dan Greene ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 3d ago
⚡ 324 h early

fion.ac

5 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

5 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Dan Greene Dare Obasanjo samuel mehr Matthew Guzdial Joshua Grochow
2 experts discussed this · 3 posts
Dare Obasanjo: The solution the industry seems to be landing on is throwing more AI at the problem. AI writes the code, AI reviews the code and no one knows how it works. fion.ac/jellyfish.pdf
Dare Obasanjo: Harvard researchers studied 718 companies and found AI coding agents increased lines of code by 30%, but no major increase in completed tasks or projects. Meanwhile, review time rose 49%. Generatin…
Marielza: Harvard researchers studied 718 companies and found AI coding agents increased lines of code by 30%, but no major increase in completed tasks or projects. Meanwhile, review time rose 49%. Generatin…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source fion.ac ↗
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 8 posts · 4d ago
Dan Greene VE, cybersocial occult investigator
VE, cybersocial occult investigator: It’s the extension of Big Data logic - that b/c you consented to give data in one aspect at one point in time (social media) means you consented to all future sales, connections, applications of th…
VE, cybersocial occult investigator: They could also make a policy that it is a bannable offense if a user of the list is discovered having trained an agent or model on the emails in the list.
Open the thread →
2 experts · 4 posts · 1d ago
Dan Greene Julian Sanchez
Julian Sanchez: I’m not sure the Panopticon is still a relevant metaphor. The point there was that a concealed machinery of surveillance could make everyone behave AS IF surveilled, even though the watchers could …
Julian Sanchez: Which is just to say: we are either at or very near a point where AI makes it possible to just actually monitor everyone simultaneously.
Open the thread →
2 experts · 3 posts · 15d ago
Mark J. Nelson Dan Greene
Dan Greene : Targeting adobe, ms, and infosys is targeting liberal execs, liberal foreign policies (in Microsoft's case in particular) and foreign capital--especially the kind us ai would like to displace. The …
Mark J. Nelson: The five companies in the WITCH acronym have been a bete noir for a while, and not only on the right, so if it were just them there might not have even been much pushback. I guess the other two are…
Open the thread →