Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Doll ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Agents & robotics Signal 17d ago
⚡ 1924 h early

GEPA: Reflective Prompt Evolution Can Outperform Reinforcement Learning

3 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · David Marx
“My understanding is that despite the fairly generalized way in which this papers claims are authored, the experiments actually render this a much narrower criticism of "GEPA" specifically, which is a particular prompt-rewriting strategy.” evidence ↗
3 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

7 experts · 83 posts · 9d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“"How neural networks reason with latent concepts" is entirely out of her wheelhouse. (If you care about her main subfield of expertise, it was about the risks of overly applying grammar rules and w…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 2 Building & implementation · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦: LLMs are not databases. They do not contain their training data.
Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦: Base rate fallacy.
Open the thread →
8 experts · 59 posts · 20d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“So there's a sort of survivorship bias. There are still lots of "jobs", but they go to the people who are still alive & in the job market after the last cohort gets gutted. The artists whose work i…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Policy & governance · 2 Opportunity & adoption · 1
apenwarr.ca: So far no labour saving device in the history of humanity has resulted in a long-term reduction in employment.
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真): So far no labour saving device in the history of humanity has resulted in a long-term reduction in employment.
Open the thread →
10 experts · 32 posts · 13d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“and like insofar as that's a worry the solutions offered (a human understands the mechanism) are not solutions that are available for existing drugs, so the takeaway I think is that clinical trials…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 2 Policy & governance · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
SE Gyges: i hate this
SE Gyges: it tells me that that fucking guy who stood up and said this shit at Neurips managed to set this as an acceptable, within-overton-window way of being pissed off about ai it isn't and anyone who say…
Open the thread →
6 experts · 19 posts · 11d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“I mean, it's easy to know, you can just ask vulnerable people and they will tell you! Perhaps the fact that you can't ask those people on that platform is a signal.” evidence ↗
Reaction converging Questions & unknowns · 4 Concern & critique · 1
Anil Dash: What denial? It is absolutely false to say it's an inclusive place. It is straight-up a place where you're welcome to tell most of us that you want us dead. It is a place where you can be paid to p…
Anil Dash: If you think *those things are okay*, then say that. But we're not in denial. We just have standards. Say that your standards have changed from who you used to be when you didn't do business with p…
Open the thread →