Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Eiko Fried ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 4 posts · 18d ago
Emily Riederer Eiko Fried Paul Hünermund alanau.bsky.social
Emily Riederer: Just occurred to me I don’t think I’ve ever seen a post I thought to be AI authored on Bluesky. Zero ways to monetize and zero clout from building a following here. Incentives are a magical thing
Paul Hünermund: Just occurred to me I don’t think I’ve ever seen a post I thought to be AI authored on Bluesky. Zero ways to monetize and zero clout from building a following here. Incentives are a magical thing
Open the thread →
2 experts · 7 posts · 18d ago
David Marx Eiko Fried
Eiko Fried: Sometimes you really wonder .. (this is 5.6 SOL)
David Marx: I think you asked the wrong question here. It is grammatically correct. Redundant language is a stylistic issue, not a grammatical one. Concrete example: tautologies are perfectly sound grammatically.
Open the thread →