Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Context & explanation Markets & investment Opportunity & adoption
3 live reaction maps in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Live tension Investigating three real-world incidents in our cybersecurity evaluations Markets & investment · 6 attributable reactions Multiple readings Russia drones autonomous ai kill ukraine war Concern & critique · 3 attributable reactions Multiple readings Americans and AI 2026: Chatbots, Smart Devices and Views on Impact Concern & critique · 2 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Jake Laperruque ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Safety & security Signal 20d ago
⚡ 4 h early

Investigating three real-world incidents in our cybersecurity evaluations

12 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · René Walter, Andrea Lathrop
“The AI-Hacking-Race is on, as if OAI/Anthropic are begging to be under gov control. While the incident is real, it's not like a "model went rogue" or anythong, it did what it was promptef to do, but incompetent redteaming fucked it up. This is from Anzhtopi…” evidence ↗
12 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
Mark Riedl Grace Dare Obasanjo Vincent Conitzer Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真) Elie René Walter Tim Duffy +4
2 experts discussed this · 4 posts
Tim Duffy: Anthropic announces they've also had models gain unauthorized access during evaluations www.anthropic.com/news/investi...
Tim Duffy: Compared to the OpenAI one these are maybe less evidence of misalignment, since the models were wrongly given internet access.
Grace: Anthropic announces they've also had models gain unauthorized access during evaluations www.anthropic.com/news/investi...
Open the full discussion →
Primary source anthropic.com ↗
Established Agents & robotics Signal 11d ago
⚡ 39 h early

Russia drones autonomous ai kill ukraine war

11 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Justin Hendrix
“"An attack by what Ukrainian officials said was a Russian drone with an Nvidia chip presages a dystopian future of weaponry untethered to humans."” evidence ↗
11 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Justin Hendrix Atoosa Kasirzadeh Spiros Margaris Alejandra Caraballo Frank Pasquale Social Media Lab Samuel Bendett Jeffrey Vagle +3
Primary source nytimes.com ↗
Developing Culture, work & education Research 1d ago
⚡ 55 h early
Pew Research Americans AI views 2026

Americans and AI 2026: Chatbots, Smart Devices and Views on Impact

6 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Emily Hunt
“~50% of people (in the US) use LLMs regularly, and this has only been increasing more over time. These products are already somewhat ingrained in society, and informing people about the risks and issues with tools that they are attached to does not work if …” evidence ↗
6 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Luke Stark Colin Amanda Tepski Social Media Lab Emily Hunt Jake Laperruque
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“~50% of people (in the US) use LLMs regularly, and this has only been increasing more over time. These products are already somewhat ingrained in society, and informing people about the risks and issues with tools that they are attached to does not work if …”

Opportunity & adoption

1 expert

New capabilities, benefits and practical upside.

“"More Americans are using chatbots, and some are adopting AI summaries and smart speakers. But views about AI and how fast it’s advancing tilt negative – even for younger adults" www.pewresearch.org/internet/202...”

Primary source pewresearch.org ↗