Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Building & implementation Concern & critique Policy & governance
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings America.gov Policy & governance · 4 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Marielza ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Resource 6d ago
⚡ 215 h early
America.gov US government resource

America.gov

25 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

25 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
Mark Riedl CSET Georgetown Chris Brockett Lightspeed Marielza Sasha Costanza-Chock Karl Bode lastpositivist.bsky.social +17
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 3 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Policy & governance

2 experts

Rules, institutions and accountability.

“America.gov does not do pronouns. Any pronouns. (Courtesy of my daughter!) aifails.substack.com/p/pronouns”

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“Jessica Ji weighed in on the new #AI-powered https://t.co/sEHIhq7mvb website for @USATODAY, saying that it can be a useful resource for people trying to navigate U.S. government websites. She also notes its risks: “When this kind of AI system is empowered t…”

Building & implementation

1 expert

How teams are shipping and applying it.

“The chatbot comes as an expansion of the Office of Personnel Management’s work to modernize access to public federal workforce data. Integration with America.gov is planned. www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SUx... Read more by @madialder.bsky.social: fedscoop.com/o…”

2 experts discussed this · 3 posts
Julian Sanchez: Ok wow. This is both extensive and deeply surreal. Tell America.gov to Play Minecraft.
Julian Sanchez: Amusingly, the chatbot appears to be unable to recognize that it said anything weird. It “thinks” it just responded that it can’t play minecraft.
Justin Hendrix: Weird
Open the full discussion →
Primary source america.gov ↗
Established AI field signal Analysis 16d ago
⚡ 116 h early
AI consciousness essay discourse

No one thinks Midjourney is alive, that's a big problem for people who think that Claude is

3 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

3 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Marielza VE, cybersocial occult investigator Matthew Sheffield

“This thread is long enough so I am not going to refute proponents' evidence, you can read that here if you would like:”

2 experts discussed this · 4 posts
Luke Stark: tempted to come up with some elaborate theory about sunscreen denialism, but I genuinely think it's mostly a case of the increasing salience being stupid has in our political divide
lastpositivist.bsky.social: Can you say more?
lastpositivist.bsky.social: No your answer is appreciated, ty!
Open the full discussion →
Primary source plus.flux.community ↗
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article