Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Research & technical analysis
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Shared emphasis Self-confessed Fabrications and Rise of TBDs Research & technical analysis · 2 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Naomi Saphra ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Accelerating AI field signal Signal 4h ago

Self-confessed Fabrications and Rise of TBDs

3 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Gautam Kamath, Christian Wolf
“How do you tell if authors fabricated their research results? Sometimes: they just tell you. Read, e.g., this caption carefully. Another banger of a post by my friend Nihar B. Shah on his blog, where he found at least 20+ such #ICLR2027 submissions: researc…” evidence ↗
3 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Naomi Saphra Gautam Kamath Christian Wolf
Primary source researchonresearch.blog ↗
Established Models & releases Research 19d ago
⚡ 1086 h early
LLM grammar shared circuits paper

Shared Circuits for Shared Grammar: Tracing Subject-Verb Agreement Across Languages

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Naomi Saphra, arxiv cs.CL
“If you're at COLM next week, check out our interpretability work, led by Isabella Gidi, on how grammatical inflection transfers across languages! Poster on Tuesday afternoon.” evidence ↗
2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Naomi Saphra arxiv cs.CL

“If you're at COLM next week, check out our interpretability work, led by Isabella Gidi, on how grammatical inflection transfers across languages! Poster on Tuesday afternoon.”

“Isabella Gidi, Antonio Almud\'evar, Core Francisco Park, Naomi Saphra, Ricard Marxer Shared Circuits for Shared Grammar: Tracing Subject-Verb Agreement Across Languages https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18545”

Primary source arxiv.org ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 3 posts · 16d ago
Naomi Saphra Mark J. Nelson
Matches Research & technical analysis
“All scientific field distinctions are ultimately socially defined categories. So the Transformers paper was an “NLP paper” not because it was about language modeling and MT, but because Vaswani wen…” evidence ↗
Shared emphasis Research & technical analysis · 2
Naomi Saphra: All scientific field distinctions are ultimately socially defined categories. So the Transformers paper was an “NLP paper” not because it was about language modeling and MT, but because Vaswani wen…
Mark J. Nelson: by a similar token, the Transformers paper is a PL paper because Łukasz Kaiser has invented or been primary contributor to like three or four functional DSLs, classic PL researcher behavior
Open the thread →