Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Scott McGrath ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 6d ago
⚡ 188 h early

Us military ai false intelligence china ship

16 experts across 6 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 3 attributable expert contributions · Damien Williams, Hagen Blix, alanau.bsky.social
“THESE are the real "existential risks" of "AI": People almost Dying because other people trust bullshit engines because said people have been sold a bill of goods as to how "powerful" "AI" is instead of understanding that its bullshit comes from the same pl…” evidence ↗
16 experts 6 communities 1 sources clustered
Developing Models & releases Signal 2d ago

Openai ai breach australia

6 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · kate conger
“The latest update in the rogue A.I. saga: OpenAI agents that were supposed to be performing mundane data requests for things like health data, historic photos and wait times at theme parks resorted to hacking attempts when they couldn't access the data they…” evidence ↗
6 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
Established AI field signal Signal 3d ago
⚡ 67 h early

Will AI really kill us all? The science behind the hype

4 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Scott McGrath, Dorothea Baur - the ethics crusader
“"AI will kill us all" gives rise to low probability thought experiments of paperclip factories and AI basilisks. Disinformation, unvetted bioweapon designs, and bad military intelligence pose far more direct threats than runaway AI superintelligence.” evidence ↗
4 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Established AI field signal Signal 3d ago
⚡ 67 h early

Will AI really kill us all? The science behind the hype

4 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Scott McGrath, Dorothea Baur - the ethics crusader
“"AI will kill us all" gives rise to low probability thought experiments of paperclip factories and AI basilisks. Disinformation, unvetted bioweapon designs, and bad military intelligence pose far more direct threats than runaway AI superintelligence.” evidence ↗
4 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Established AI field signal Signal 3d ago
⚡ 67 h early

Will AI really kill us all? The science behind the hype

4 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Scott McGrath, Dorothea Baur - the ethics crusader
“"AI will kill us all" gives rise to low probability thought experiments of paperclip factories and AI basilisks. Disinformation, unvetted bioweapon designs, and bad military intelligence pose far more direct threats than runaway AI superintelligence.” evidence ↗
4 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Established AI field signal Signal 3d ago
⚡ 67 h early

Will AI really kill us all? The science behind the hype

4 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Scott McGrath, Dorothea Baur - the ethics crusader
“"AI will kill us all" gives rise to low probability thought experiments of paperclip factories and AI basilisks. Disinformation, unvetted bioweapon designs, and bad military intelligence pose far more direct threats than runaway AI superintelligence.” evidence ↗
4 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Established AI field signal Signal 3d ago
⚡ 67 h early

Will AI really kill us all? The science behind the hype

4 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Scott McGrath, Dorothea Baur - the ethics crusader
“"AI will kill us all" gives rise to low probability thought experiments of paperclip factories and AI basilisks. Disinformation, unvetted bioweapon designs, and bad military intelligence pose far more direct threats than runaway AI superintelligence.” evidence ↗
4 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Established AI field signal Signal 3d ago
⚡ 67 h early

Will AI really kill us all? The science behind the hype

4 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Scott McGrath, Dorothea Baur - the ethics crusader
“"AI will kill us all" gives rise to low probability thought experiments of paperclip factories and AI basilisks. Disinformation, unvetted bioweapon designs, and bad military intelligence pose far more direct threats than runaway AI superintelligence.” evidence ↗
4 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Established AI field signal Signal 3d ago
⚡ 67 h early

Will AI really kill us all? The science behind the hype

4 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Scott McGrath, Dorothea Baur - the ethics crusader
“"AI will kill us all" gives rise to low probability thought experiments of paperclip factories and AI basilisks. Disinformation, unvetted bioweapon designs, and bad military intelligence pose far more direct threats than runaway AI superintelligence.” evidence ↗
4 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Established AI field signal Signal 3d ago
⚡ 67 h early

Will AI really kill us all? The science behind the hype

4 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Scott McGrath, Dorothea Baur - the ethics crusader
“"AI will kill us all" gives rise to low probability thought experiments of paperclip factories and AI basilisks. Disinformation, unvetted bioweapon designs, and bad military intelligence pose far more direct threats than runaway AI superintelligence.” evidence ↗
4 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Established AI field signal Signal 3d ago
⚡ 67 h early

Will AI really kill us all? The science behind the hype

4 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Scott McGrath, Dorothea Baur - the ethics crusader
“"AI will kill us all" gives rise to low probability thought experiments of paperclip factories and AI basilisks. Disinformation, unvetted bioweapon designs, and bad military intelligence pose far more direct threats than runaway AI superintelligence.” evidence ↗
4 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Established AI field signal Signal 3d ago
⚡ 91 h early

Will AI really kill us all? The science behind the hype

4 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Scott McGrath, Dorothea Baur - the ethics crusader
“"AI will kill us all" gives rise to low probability thought experiments of paperclip factories and AI basilisks. Disinformation, unvetted bioweapon designs, and bad military intelligence pose far more direct threats than runaway AI superintelligence.” evidence ↗
4 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Established AI field signal Signal 3d ago
⚡ 91 h early

Will AI really kill us all? The science behind the hype

4 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Scott McGrath, Dorothea Baur - the ethics crusader
“"AI will kill us all" gives rise to low probability thought experiments of paperclip factories and AI basilisks. Disinformation, unvetted bioweapon designs, and bad military intelligence pose far more direct threats than runaway AI superintelligence.” evidence ↗
4 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Established AI field signal Signal 3d ago
⚡ 91 h early

Will AI really kill us all? The science behind the hype

4 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Scott McGrath, Dorothea Baur - the ethics crusader
“"AI will kill us all" gives rise to low probability thought experiments of paperclip factories and AI basilisks. Disinformation, unvetted bioweapon designs, and bad military intelligence pose far more direct threats than runaway AI superintelligence.” evidence ↗
4 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Established AI field signal Signal 3d ago
⚡ 91 h early

Will AI really kill us all? The science behind the hype

4 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Scott McGrath, Dorothea Baur - the ethics crusader
“"AI will kill us all" gives rise to low probability thought experiments of paperclip factories and AI basilisks. Disinformation, unvetted bioweapon designs, and bad military intelligence pose far more direct threats than runaway AI superintelligence.” evidence ↗
4 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Established AI field signal Signal 3d ago
⚡ 91 h early

Will AI really kill us all? The science behind the hype

4 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Scott McGrath, Dorothea Baur - the ethics crusader
“"AI will kill us all" gives rise to low probability thought experiments of paperclip factories and AI basilisks. Disinformation, unvetted bioweapon designs, and bad military intelligence pose far more direct threats than runaway AI superintelligence.” evidence ↗
4 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Established AI field signal Signal 3d ago
⚡ 91 h early

Will AI really kill us all? The science behind the hype

4 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Scott McGrath, Dorothea Baur - the ethics crusader
“"AI will kill us all" gives rise to low probability thought experiments of paperclip factories and AI basilisks. Disinformation, unvetted bioweapon designs, and bad military intelligence pose far more direct threats than runaway AI superintelligence.” evidence ↗
4 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Established AI field signal Signal 3d ago
⚡ 91 h early

Will AI really kill us all? The science behind the hype

4 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Scott McGrath, Dorothea Baur - the ethics crusader
“"AI will kill us all" gives rise to low probability thought experiments of paperclip factories and AI basilisks. Disinformation, unvetted bioweapon designs, and bad military intelligence pose far more direct threats than runaway AI superintelligence.” evidence ↗
4 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

15 experts · 41 posts · 9d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“Did you try this yourself? Because I feel like a lot of people who dismiss AI coding outright have no idea what it's like. People are criticizing and fighting the idea of it they have in their head…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 3 Research & technical analysis · 2 Policy & governance · 1
Grace: He's upfront with when he uses AI, so you can trust he's upfront with when he doesn't
mackuba.eu: Please just stop…
Open the thread →
7 experts · 28 posts · 17d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“keep in mind you’re experiencing selection bias — everyone you talked to already left the country” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 2 Questions & unknowns · 2 Building & implementation · 1
Tim Kellogg: 8 very interesting plots regarding AI sentiment
Tim Kellogg: tbc these are opinions, and while it is a fact that someone had an opinion, an opinion doesn’t necessarily predict the future, even at scale
Open the thread →
3 experts · 13 posts · 1d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“Oh, I'm aware. It's just that it's not a position that's structurally tenable when millions of people and organizations have already bought in. We're in a harm reduction phase for many parts of soc…” evidence ↗
Anil Dash: I’ll get one of these every couple of days (which is fine, people should use block lists to manage their experiences online), but I always want to ask them: do you know what local models are? What …
Anil Dash: I don’t fault anybody for hating big AI and wanting to fight it; I do too. But I don’t think a lot of the folks who do are familiar with data unions, or collectively-owned/created technologies, and…
Open the thread →