Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Shared emphasis Some Kids Will Never Think AI Is Cool Concern & critique · 2 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Scott McGrath ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Culture, work & education Analysis 3d ago
⚡ 4 h early
kids reject AI generational divide

Some Kids Will Never Think AI Is Cool

5 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Scott McGrath, Charles Logan
“Some Kids Will Never Think AI Is Cool 37% of teens cringe at AI content, and more than half worry about deepfakes. While youth usually adopt new tech eagerly, this skepticism is coming off different.” evidence ↗
5 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Luke Stark Scott McGrath Mél Hogan / The Data Fix Charles Logan Neil Turkewitz
How the network is reacting 2 experts are emphasizing concern & critique.
Shared emphasis

Concern & critique

2 experts

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“Some Kids Will Never Think AI Is Cool 37% of teens cringe at AI content, and more than half worry about deepfakes. While youth usually adopt new tech eagerly, this skepticism is coming off different.”

Primary source wired.com ↗
Established AI field signal Signal 4d ago

Ai risk bioweapons

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Scott McGrath
“A survey of 272 AI researchers, experts estimate a 12% chance that AI causes a catastrophic outcome by 2030, even with active mitigation. The primary fear among industry leaders isn't generic software failure, but AI expediting the design and synthesis of n…” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Scott McGrath

“A survey of 272 AI researchers, experts estimate a 12% chance that AI causes a catastrophic outcome by 2030, even with active mitigation. The primary fear among industry leaders isn't generic software failure, but AI expediting the design and synthesis of n…”

Primary source axios.com ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

5 experts · 8 posts · 3d ago
Michael Osborne Scott McGrath Cameron tachikoma brennan
Matches Concern & critique
“It's not actually spending no money though -- running social media anywhere costs resources, attention, diverts focus, salaries, etc. It also exposes you to brand risk, since the hordes of dipshits…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Building & implementation · 1
tachikoma: the labs are power-seeking entities, and there is little to no power here
tachikoma: i'd say there's a foundation, or framework, from which something with power might emerge in the future. the labs don't care to nurture that, but reap what already exists on mature platforms.
Open the thread →