Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Scott McGrath ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing Models & releases Development 1d ago
⚡ 2 h early
Claude chats exposed Google indexing

Tons of Peoples’ Claude Chats and Creations are Exposed on Google

4 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

4 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered

“Claude users are creating public share links, but probably don't realize that means their chats are now ending up in Google searches where anyone can dig through them.”

“Tons of peoples' Claude chats are exposed on Google. Cryptocurrency keys, API keys, login credentials, legal discussions, more. This happened with ChatGPT last year. And Claude too. There's clearly an ongoing issue with search engines indexing peoples' AI c…”

Developing Policy & governance Development 1d ago
⚡ 7 h early
Trump AI brain trust Wired profile

This Is Donald Trump’s AI Brain Trust

3 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

3 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered

“This Is Donald Trump’s AI Brain Trust www.wired.com/story/this-i...”

“These are the admin power players in Trump's ear about AI regulation (and they're often telling him different things):”

Established Culture, work & education Analysis 3d ago
⚡ 4 h early
kids reject AI generational divide

Some Kids Will Never Think AI Is Cool

5 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

5 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting 2 experts are emphasizing concern & critique.
Shared emphasis

Concern & critique

2 experts

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“Some Kids Will Never Think AI Is Cool 37% of teens cringe at AI content, and more than half worry about deepfakes. While youth usually adopt new tech eagerly, this skepticism is coming off different.”

Established Models & releases Research 4d ago
⚡ 5 h early
LLM health medicine benchmark red-teaming paper

Addressing benchmarking gaps in large language models for health and medicine with dynamic red-teaming - Nature Health

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“Nearly 94% of previously correct MedQA answers fail when medical LLMs face dynamic red-teaming. This new Nature Health paper exposes a massive benchmarking gap where models passing static exams fail under stress. They also leaked privacy data in 86% of clin…”

Established AI research Research 4d ago
meaningful oversight medical AI paper

Meaningful oversight of medical AI beyond human in the loop - npj Digital Medicine

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“Placing a clinician in the loop doesn't guarantee medical AI safety if they lack time or authority to disagree. The authors here outline four system requirements for real oversight: • Epistemic capacity • Cognitive space • Decisional authority • Effective i…”

Established AI field signal Signal 4d ago

Ai risk bioweapons

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“A survey of 272 AI researchers, experts estimate a 12% chance that AI causes a catastrophic outcome by 2030, even with active mitigation. The primary fear among industry leaders isn't generic software failure, but AI expediting the design and synthesis of n…”

Established AI research Analysis 6d ago
Scientists resist giving AI their joy

Don’t let AI steal all the joy: what scientists won’t give up to chatbots

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“This short piece is lining up with where I think we might see science and AI head. I envision AI use evolving more as a customized toolsets, instead of a one size fits all approachl. Give the AI work they tend to avoid, but reserve the elements they relish …”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

5 experts · 8 posts · 3d ago
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Building & implementation · 1
tachikoma: the labs are power-seeking entities, and there is little to no power here
tachikoma: i'd say there's a foundation, or framework, from which something with power might emerge in the future. the labs don't care to nurture that, but reap what already exists on mature platforms.
Open the thread →