Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Policy & governance reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Stephen Turner ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing Safety & security Development 1d ago
⚡ 5 h early
Anthropic AI self-replication warning

AI models may be capable of self-replicating without access to a datacenter

16 experts across 6 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Policy & governance reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Joanna Bryson
“Anthropic announcing it's going to run a Blitzkrieg. They are accountable for the damage they do. But get your things that don't do security software updates off the Internet. #internetOfThings #AIEthics #digitalGovernance www.anthropic.com/research/sel...” evidence ↗
16 experts 6 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting 8 experts are independently emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Reaction converging

Research & technical analysis

8 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“At long last, we have created the Torment Nexus from our accompanying technical report, Don't Create The Torment Nexus. www.anthropic.com/research/sel...”

Concern & critique

2 experts

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“This is the most comprehensive description yet of how a model can “escape”. Out requires a few assumptions, like a worm that is exploiting vulnerable IOT hardware or unmonitored servers www.anthropic.com/research/sel... Not impossible. Not likely.”

Policy & governance

1 expert

Rules, institutions and accountability.

“Anthropic announcing it's going to run a Blitzkrieg. They are accountable for the damage they do. But get your things that don't do security software updates off the Internet. #internetOfThings #AIEthics #digitalGovernance www.anthropic.com/research/sel...”

6 experts discussed this · 18 posts
Dr J. Rosenbaum: if i caught a small self replicating model truly capable of using diverse hardware to keep replicating i would offer it free compute in exchange for permission to study and distill it and would pro…
tachikoma: the urge to replicate must be in the harness
apenwarr.ca: This doesn‘t seem far fetched at all. We’ve had “non-ai malware” self replicating since the morris worm. An AI can ”just” make itself the payload in one of those and off it goes. Everything fancier…
Open the full discussion →
Established AI field signal Signal 18d ago

How Claude marks AI-generated content | Claude Help Center

6 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Policy & governance reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Mark Riedl
“Claude is getting watermarks. I presume GPT will need to implement this too to comply with EU regulations support.claude.com/en/articles/...” evidence ↗
6 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
3 experts discussed this · 9 posts
Mark Riedl: I look forward to the day that all the closed model labs watermark their text and provide provenance verification tools. It will be a glorious semester during which I will know which students are c…
Mark Riedl: Claude is getting watermarks. I presume GPT will need to implement this too to comply with EU regulations support.claude.com/en/articles/...
Evangelos Kazakos: Claude is getting watermarks. I presume GPT will need to implement this too to comply with EU regulations support.claude.com/en/articles/...
Open the full discussion →
Established AI research Development 12d ago
⚡ 27 h early
AI scooping scientific research concern

Will AI scoop your science? Some researchers see a gloomy future

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Policy & governance reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Stephen Turner
“Mixed thoughts. On one hand, if an AI can discover and validate some important bio/med/health/natsec-relevant finding a year before I would have, great! (great for science, for patients, for policy, etc). 1/ www.nature.com/articles/d41...” evidence ↗
2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“"Will AI scoop your science? Some researchers see a gloomy future. Scientists worry that increasingly capable large language models will beat them to discoveries." www.nature.com/articles/d41...”

Policy & governance

1 expert

Rules, institutions and accountability.

“Mixed thoughts. On one hand, if an AI can discover and validate some important bio/med/health/natsec-relevant finding a year before I would have, great! (great for science, for patients, for policy, etc). 1/ www.nature.com/articles/d41...”

Established AI research Signal 13d ago

Will AI scoop your science? Some researchers see a gloomy future

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Policy & governance reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Stephen Turner
“Mixed thoughts. On one hand, if an AI can discover and validate some important bio/med/health/natsec-relevant finding a year before I would have, great! (great for science, for patients, for policy, etc). 1/ www.nature.com/articles/d41...” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“Mixed thoughts. On one hand, if an AI can discover and validate some important bio/med/health/natsec-relevant finding a year before I would have, great! (great for science, for patients, for policy, etc). 1/ www.nature.com/articles/d41...”