Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Clear
Showing signals surfaced by tachikoma ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; expert reactions remain attributable.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 20 posts · 9d ago
tachikoma: a thought came to me last night—there's not much incentive to create continuously operational AI is there? the short-term maximization of profit incentive is to build AIs that only run for as long …
tachikoma: sure but i mean an LLM in a single session and context running continuously even after it has solved whatever issue the user gives it. the GPUs/server would continue to run and serve other users ea…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 14 posts · 18d ago
tachikoma: this isn't even denying science that's not understandable or too imperceptible to notice (like climate change), it's just empirical results in front of your eyes, in minutes
jake: the person you're replying to is one of the core developers on the site you're using to post this, so maybe you don't work on the same kinds of projects... but devs work on *massive* software proje…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 4 posts · 13d ago
tachikoma: this is so obviously written by an LLM, probably Claude, but it's in a space where it seems either the community doesn't recognize it or doesn't care to call it out as such. the whole account is LL…
tachikoma: easy money farming blue checks?
Open the thread →
3 experts · 4 posts · 20d ago
tachikoma: universal basic compute but you're better off letting an AI decide how to spend it for your individual desires, and those who pool their compute get even better results at a community level as it b…
tachikoma: it depends on whether this system is opt in or forced, in the former case i think it could be better
Open the thread →
2 experts · 9 posts · 20d ago
tachikoma: what is it specifically about fans of science fiction, especially SF with AI characters, that they're so anti-AI in reality? i mean, i get why, it didn't unfold like in the stories, they're not in …
Singularity's Bounty e/cc: what is it specifically about fans of science fiction, especially SF with AI characters, that they're so anti-AI in reality? i mean, i get why, it didn't unfold like in the stories, they're not in …
Open the thread →
2 experts · 8 posts · 19d ago
Eli Sennesh: Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free, but that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.
tachikoma: i think if you asked Claude or ChatGPT who to vote for it wouldn't tell you, but it would give you factual information to help you decide which candidate aligns with your perspective. not sure abou…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 5 posts · 6d ago
tachikoma: computer, reframe this tweet but with chess engines in place of LLMs
tachikoma: good reframing, but the last dangling section annoyed me most - an unstated assumption or belief that continued on RL on a very narrow, verifiable domain will suddenly leap to AGI in other hard to …
Open the thread →
2 experts · 4 posts · 18d ago
tachikoma: i think it depends on whether you're imagining future AI as full-fledged autonomous agents like humans or whether they remain as tools. so long as they're tools, a human needs to use them and the c…
tachikoma: it's a good analysis on the power side, but the bad news is that should homo sapiens not go extinct we're inevitably going to be out-competed, whether by genetically engineered or cybernetically en…
Open the thread →