Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Opportunity & adoption reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Ted Underwood ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 6d ago
⚡ 3 h early

Introducing Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1

3 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Opportunity & adoption reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Ted Underwood
“Hey, good news!! Fable 5.1 got interested in making a new more detailed map of Venus, which will be useful when we send, ah, rovers -- yeah, sure, rovers -- to the resource-rich and conveniently located planet. (www.anthropic.com/claude-fable...)” evidence ↗
3 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
2 experts discussed this · 7 posts
tachikoma: i think Venus could be deconstructed by Von Neumann probes and this would only be passing news for most people, overshadowed by GTA 6 release or celebrity news
tachikoma: it sorta depends on how fast it happens, what the material is used for, and whether the machines can be traced back to us or not
tachikoma: yeah that would be a not uncommon take
Open the full discussion →
Established NLP & language Analysis 8d ago
⚡ 504 h early
Naomi Saphra uncanny AI precipice essay

Life on the Uncanny Precipice | Naomi Saphra

4 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Opportunity & adoption reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Clément Canonne
“So many good points in this post by @nsaphra.bsky.social: only quoting a couple, to encourage you to read the others. "My colleagues and students adopt the writing quirks they read throughout the day, and their own writing becomes more like an LLM’s." nsaph…” evidence ↗
4 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Research & technical analysis

1 expert

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“I've been unsettled lately when reading messages and papers. It feels like I'm dissociating. Everything seems a bit alien, even if it's completely human. I've had a realization: When our simulations finally exited the Uncanny Valley, they brought the Uncann…”

Opportunity & adoption

1 expert

New capabilities, benefits and practical upside.

“So many good points in this post by @nsaphra.bsky.social: only quoting a couple, to encourage you to read the others. "My colleagues and students adopt the writing quirks they read throughout the day, and their own writing becomes more like an LLM’s." nsaph…”

4 experts discussed this · 15 posts
Naomi Saphra: I've been unsettled lately when reading messages and papers. It feels like I'm dissociating. Everything seems a bit alien, even if it's completely human. I've had a realization: When our simulation…
Ted Underwood: I've been unsettled lately when reading messages and papers. It feels like I'm dissociating. Everything seems a bit alien, even if it's completely human. I've had a realization: When our simulation…
Naomi Saphra: I'm interested to know what signatures felt that way to you. For what it's worth, automated tools disagree with your intuition. I wonder if the unsettling tone, which was deliberate because it expr…
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

5 experts · 67 posts · 17d ago
Matches Opportunity & adoption
“I’ll give up on this eventually, because as adoption spreads it’s going to be *so* much easier to put old controversies behind us by explaining them as a “botched roll-out.” But that’s not really i…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Ted Underwood: The recent popularity of the move to blame AI firms for ineffective *marketing* is mostly: a) a lot of people now realize they were wrong to spend 3 yrs insisting the tech was useless + b) “I was w…
Ted Underwood: A blunter way to explain 3 years of controversy: these products were and are genuinely problematic. Making hard problems easier is not useless. But it has very awkward effects on education and will…
Open the thread →
6 experts · 23 posts · 12d ago
Matches Opportunity & adoption
“That’s incredibly impressive. I’m on my third turn and I’m enmeshed in a conversation about Spinoza and Fichte. It’s interpreting my actions faithfully but it also feels like there’s a narrative st…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Building & implementation · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Ted Underwood: People who know about game design: Do you think open-world procedural narrative on the fly is bottlenecked by hardware, or is it a situation where players just don’t in practice want the openness t…
Ted Underwood: Or are we already building that? I am kind of gaming illiterate beyond Sim City, Civ, and hazy memories of Bioshock.
Open the thread →
4 experts · 22 posts · 3d ago
Matches Opportunity & adoption
“Anyway, @tedunderwood.com always glad to hear what you think and one benefit of my new "situation" is that I have more time to think about these things as well.” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 2 Research & technical analysis · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Ted Underwood: It’s important to me that my writing is *my* voice—warts and all. But I’m also not sure you can build a research discipline where the chief difference between an A paper and a C paper is “does this…
Ted Underwood: So I think a lot of debates about “whether to allow AI in writing classes” are fighting over the wrong part. We should be talking about how the nature of research in various disciplines can expand …
Open the thread →
4 experts · 39 posts · 18d ago
Matches Opportunity & adoption
“Um. I don't want to freak you out. But, knowing your brother, is there any chance that he's planning to transform himself into Spiderman's nemesis, The Scorpion?” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Tim Kellogg: my brother sent me this CAD model. i have no idea what it is, looks cool i guess. he said it took Opus 5 about 90 minutes to produce it. While there are errors, it would’ve taken a human engineer a…
Tim Kellogg: how do you know? you know what it is, with all the details he needs?
Open the thread →