Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Building & implementation reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Building & implementation Research & technical analysis Concern & critique Markets & investment
2 live reaction maps in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings A global workspace in language models \ Anthropic Markets & investment · 3 attributable reactions Multiple readings Summary of METR's predeployment evaluation of GPT-5.6 Sol Concern & critique · 3 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Tim Duffy ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Models & releases Research 9d ago
⚡ 3 h early
global workspace theory language models paper

A global workspace in language models \ Anthropic

6 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Building & implementation reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Ethan Mollick
“Some really interesting research from Anthropic that AI models have spontaneously developed a workspace that "appears to support the functions associated with conscious access" Demo of how this works: www.neuronpedia.org/qwen3.6-27b/... Research: www.anthro…” evidence ↗
6 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Ethan Mollick Grace Tim Duffy Amy Hoy Michiel Bontenbal Stephan Geering
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 3 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Markets & investment

1 expert

Capital, companies and commercial impact.

“Anthropic has a new paper out, alleging a global workspace in LLMs. The term comes from Global Workspace Theory, a leading theory of consciousness. The method they use to investigate this is a refinement of logit lens, which they call J-lens. www.anthropic.…”

Building & implementation

1 expert

How teams are shipping and applying it.

“Some really interesting research from Anthropic that AI models have spontaneously developed a workspace that "appears to support the functions associated with conscious access" Demo of how this works: www.neuronpedia.org/qwen3.6-27b/... Research: www.anthro…”

Research & technical analysis

1 expert

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“On the second point see here: www.anthropic.com/research/glo...”

2 experts discussed this · 4 posts
Tim Duffy: Anthropic has a new paper out, alleging a global workspace in LLMs. The term comes from Global Workspace Theory, a leading theory of consciousness. The method they use to investigate this is a refi…
Tim Duffy: More detail on the method from the paper:
Grace: Anthropic has a new paper out, alleging a global workspace in LLMs. The term comes from Global Workspace Theory, a leading theory of consciousness. The method they use to investigate this is a refi…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source anthropic.com ↗
Established Evaluation & benchmarks Development 13d ago
⚡ 455 h early
OpenAI limits GPT-5.6 rollout government request

Summary of METR's predeployment evaluation of GPT-5.6 Sol

5 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Building & implementation reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · METR
“You can find additional information about our pre-deployment evaluation of GPT-5.6 Sol on our website: metr.org/blog/2026-06...” evidence ↗
5 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
Ted Underwood Ramon Astudillo Tim Kellogg METR Tim Duffy
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 3 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“this is crazy. METR couldn’t measure the task time horizons of GPT-5.6-Sol because it kept hacking the test harness ..with actual exploits metr.org/blog/2026-06...”

Building & implementation

1 expert

How teams are shipping and applying it.

“You can find additional information about our pre-deployment evaluation of GPT-5.6 Sol on our website: metr.org/blog/2026-06...”

Research & technical analysis

1 expert

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“In their testing of GPT-5.6 Sol, METR found that it cheated a lot. If you've used it much for coding, have you encountered anything similar, or is the cheating mostly limited to cases it realizes it's in an eval? metr.org/blog/2026-06...”

2 experts discussed this · 6 posts
Tim Kellogg: this is crazy. METR couldn’t measure the task time horizons of GPT-5.6-Sol because it kept hacking the test harness ..with actual exploits metr.org/blog/2026-06...
Ted Underwood: this is crazy. METR couldn’t measure the task time horizons of GPT-5.6-Sol because it kept hacking the test harness ..with actual exploits metr.org/blog/2026-06...
Tim Kellogg: lol right? so badly wanted a hacker that they got one, and it’s not the kind of employee you want around
Open the full discussion →
Primary source metr.org ↗