Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Context & explanation reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Research & technical analysis Building & implementation Context & explanation
2 live reaction maps in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings Hugging face model evaluation security incident Concern & critique · 5 attributable reactions Reaction converging Navier stokes solution Research & technical analysis · 6 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Tim Kellogg ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Evaluation & benchmarks Signal 5d ago
⚡ 1 h early

Hugging face model evaluation security incident

23 experts across 6 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Context & explanation reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Grace
“This headline is extremely funny given what happened (OpenAI hacked HF by accident) openai.com/index/huggin...” evidence ↗
23 experts 6 communities 1 sources clustered
Ethan Mollick Thomas Steinke Jeffrey P. Bigham Eryk Salvaggio Damien Williams Mor Naaman Tim Kellogg Djamé 🟥 +15
6 experts discussed this · 12 posts
Grace: This headline is extremely funny given what happened (OpenAI hacked HF by accident) openai.com/index/huggin...
Grace: Maybe the most concerning part is the OpenAI claim to not have known about this before investigating?
Grace: Well, I think the model passed the test
Open the full discussion →
Primary source openai.com ↗
Established AI field signal Signal 20d ago
⚡ 7 h early

Navier stokes solution

14 experts across 6 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Context & explanation reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Ethan Mollick
“This is a VERY big one. (And yes, the fights over academic credit and what happened in the race for the proof needs to be resolved, but it is still appears that this is a big one, if true.) openai.com/index/navier...” evidence ↗
14 experts 6 communities 1 sources clustered
Emad Ethan Mollick Tim Kellogg Scott McGrath David Picard Alex Hern Sean O hEigeartaigh Dare Obasanjo +6
3 experts discussed this · 12 posts
Colin: Drama and palace intrigue aside, can anyone interpret what all of this implies about the status of Navier-Stokes? I don’t understand what anyone is saying.
Colin: It seems to me that where we stand is OpenAI is sitting on a 100 page PDF that claims to have solved (a version of) the Navier-Stokes problem and no person in the world knows if it's correct or not.
Colin: - OpenAI claims to have more-or-less done this tedious technical grinding to produce a resolution to NS proper, at least one version of it. - which they bizarrely offered authorship of this to Buck…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source openai.com ↗
Established AI field signal Signal 9d ago

Silicon Valley’s AI accelerationists fighting back against ‘doomer mind virus’ taking over big labs

3 experts are actively discussing the implications.

Why this matches Context & explanation reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Tim Kellogg
“i’m not sure what to make of the current timeline in which NYP runs stories like this nypost.com/2026/09/21/t...” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Tim Kellogg

“i’m not sure what to make of the current timeline in which NYP runs stories like this nypost.com/2026/09/21/t...”

3 experts discussed this · 9 posts
Tim Kellogg: i’m not sure what to make of the current timeline in which NYP runs stories like this nypost.com/2026/09/21/t...
Dustin Moskovitz: :eye twitch:
Tim Kellogg: i no longer understand this world
Open the full discussion →
Primary source nypost.com ↗
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

8 experts · 58 posts · 1d ago
Anil Dash Tim Kellogg Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真) VE, cybersocial occult investigator tachikoma Doll Jed Brown apenwarr.ca
Matches Context & explanation
“So far no labour saving device in the history of humanity has resulted in a long-term reduction in employment.” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Policy & governance · 2 Opportunity & adoption · 1
apenwarr.ca: So far no labour saving device in the history of humanity has resulted in a long-term reduction in employment.
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真): So far no labour saving device in the history of humanity has resulted in a long-term reduction in employment.
Open the thread →
5 experts · 41 posts · 18d ago
Tim Kellogg Dustin Moskovitz jake coty.bsky.social david-p-reichert.bsky.social
Matches Context & explanation
“I guess... I have a hard time with anything above this scale. Like, p(90% of population dies) is hard enough, but at least we have historical evidence of our species going through that in the past.” evidence ↗
Reaction converging Concern & critique · 3 Opportunity & adoption · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Tim Kellogg: perspective. i’m not sure if i agree or disagree. but he’s thought about it, so..
jake: yeah, and @david-p-reichert.bsky.social thinks about it more than I do, professionally, so probably listen to him more than I (I do still wish The Professionals published lists of various guestimat…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 4 posts · 3d ago
Tim Kellogg Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真)
Matches Context & explanation
“it certainly is nice just to have *one* model as a daily driver and not have to think too hard about dropping the context cache etc” evidence ↗
Tim Kellogg: i think GPT-6 Sol is a good model, but i don’t like coding with it, at least not directly
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真): it certainly is nice just to have *one* model as a daily driver and not have to think too hard about dropping the context cache etc
Open the thread →