Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Sarah T Roberts, PhD ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Development 11d ago
⚡ 2 h early
humans reading Microsoft Copilot prompts

Humans Are Reading Copilot Prompts — And They're Horrified

10 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

10 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“Human contractors are reviewing Copilot users’ prompts and uploaded images, according to internal documents obtained by 404 Media. The contractors are also bombarded with users’ requests for sexual AI images. www.404media.co/humans-readi...”

“Crucially these contractors are not hired to filter out offensive content. They are hired to report whether Copilot successfully made a good AI image. So if the request is, make this person's breasts larger, they have to review based on whether it did or no…”

Established Compute & infrastructure Signal 19d ago
⚡ 182 h early

Meta ai data centers taxes

9 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

9 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Established Policy & governance Development 19d ago
⚡ 4 h early
White House AI accord spelling error

‘President of the Unites States’: White House’s AI accord includes spelling error

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

2 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered

“www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...”

2 experts discussed this · 2 posts
Sarah T Roberts, PhD: Led by the most superest intelligentiest of them all. What could go wrong when a bunch of mediocre men get together and mutually decide they’re all geniuses. P.S. it’s just military contract grifting.
Karen Gregory: www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 7 posts · 17h ago
Sarah T Roberts, PhD: Another friend responded, “I’m wondering who programmed AI that it’s ‘smart’ to write paragraphs-long inquires to overly busy people.” lol. Exactly.
Sarah T Roberts, PhD: I’ve been getting about two requests for PhD supervision per day lately. This is waaaaaay above average. I have an autoreply on that states that I’m not taking any new students this cycle. But a fr…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 3 posts · 8d ago
wells: i'm so curious what the chatter about it irl has been, absolutely wild for the ai agent to send this email out exactly while so many people are together in person
Sarah T Roberts, PhD: I’m in a meeting but my channels tell me that people are cackling with laughter/pissed/bemused/thankful for the quick ban. All at once. #AOIR2026
Open the thread →