Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Research & technical analysis
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by jake ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

5 experts · 27 posts · 20h ago
Mark J. Nelson Eli Sennesh SE Gyges Meredith Martin jake
Matches Research & technical analysis
“i am not convinced we have good measures for what we want, which is actually "not full of shit"” evidence ↗
Shared emphasis Questions & unknowns · 2
SE Gyges: unpopular opinion, "admits uncertainty" and "flags nuances" are shit. they are terrible fucking traits actually. is the sky blue? do we really know that? what is blue, anyway? many cultures have di…
SE Gyges: if gemini argon is a remarkably good model it is good because it is simply not optimized for this specific set of toxic, absurd, brain-poisoned behavior. it would actually defy belief that it happe…
Open the thread →
4 experts · 31 posts · 5d ago
Maxim Raginsky jake Colin tweety fish
Matches Research & technical analysis
“I would simply look at the properties of the thing you end up with after performing the silicon neuron experiment and see how it behaves in order to inform my preliminary assessment of what it is” evidence ↗
Shared emphasis Research & technical analysis · 2
Colin: I see people say this all the time and I think it’s just wrong in general. I don’t think you can make human skin out of pebbles. This is not because I think human skin is magic and pebbles are non-…
Colin: Consciousness may or may not be the kind of thing you can make out of artificial neural networks. Magic does not need to have anything to do with it.
Open the thread →
4 experts · 14 posts · 21h ago
Eugene Vinitsky SE Gyges jake Doll
Matches Research & technical analysis
“Yeah I get it. I’m just saying that if I were working for Anthropic, you’d definitely hear me being a lot more circumspect about eg China or open weights models. I wouldn’t *lie* to you about my be…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
SE Gyges: "my best case future involves people competing viciously with each other for power forever" is just so fucking grim to me man
SE Gyges: if you are mad that we are not moving to the star trek future you should, like, try to chart course for that future. why would anyone do less
Open the thread →