Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Clear
Showing signals surfaced by jake ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; expert reactions remain attributable.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 11 posts · 3d ago
dan: again i don’t quite understand this because mathematics is fundamental. the platonic voice in me says let’s see the undiscovered country! no one is poorer for having skipped a few thousand years of…
Ted Underwood: again i don’t quite understand this because mathematics is fundamental. the platonic voice in me says let’s see the undiscovered country! no one is poorer for having skipped a few thousand years of…
Open the thread →
4 experts · 6 posts · 5d ago
Ethan Mollick: I am confused about the belief that if open weights eventually dominate it will lead to the collapse of AI. If the Labs lose (which is not happening now), it isn’t because AI was useless: compute i…
apenwarr.ca: Could lead to a dotcom-level crash, which was giant but notably didn’t kill the whole Internet. Hardware providers, they suffered tremendously after the dotcom crash (see Nortel) because their buye…
Open the thread →