Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 24 posts · 9h ago
Pwnallthethings SE Gyges david-p-reichert.bsky.social
Matches Concern & critique
“"AI is so dangerous we must have a plan for USG to deliberately intervene to pace it" and "it is important to have open-weight models that are not controllable by anyone (e.g. to pace it)" seem to …” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Policy & governance · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
SE Gyges: here's who signed both the Pacing the Frontier letter released today and the Pause AI letter in 2023 demanding an end to all research for six months also, raw counts for "signed today's letter" and…
SE Gyges: fundamentally this is an anthropic thing that managed to recruit some people from other companies
Open the thread →
3 experts · 12 posts · 12h ago
Ted Underwood jake tachikoma
Matches Concern & critique
“That only raises the bar for being concerned with it being *only* in the hands of a “flawed democracy”, no? Besides: China *will* get this tech, and it *will* proliferate. Best help prepare for a w…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
tachikoma: this regime ends in 2029, but what comes next? what if it's worse, not just ideologically but in terms of vision and competence?
tachikoma: we should try to avoid that outcome by building resilience, which i think comes from decentralization, on the web and in the physical world
Open the thread →
4 experts · 6 posts · 18h ago
Damien Williams Karl Bode Erin Kissane tweety fish
Matches Concern & critique
“it's also really just...quite hollow? Like it's not really very interesting? And that's even before it leans into the lazy "many sectors use more water than AI therefore all environmental criticism…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Policy & governance · 1
Damien Williams: I'm reading the "environmentalists are wrong about data centers" piece from the NYT and ohmygoditssofuckingbad. Apparently, so long as you're punching left, they'll just let you say any goddamn thi…
Damien Williams: And, again: golf courses and flat lawns and monocropping agribusiness practices are ALSO BAD. *More Than One Thing Can Be Bad*!
Open the thread →