Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Policy & governance reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 7 posts · 14h ago
Matches Policy & governance
“On reflection I’m not sure I respect the candor either, because, does Amodei have any expectation this will persuade ppl in tech? Surely not. Perhaps the actual audience for this is policy makers i…” evidence ↗
Reaction converging Policy & governance · 3
Ted Underwood: On reflection I’m not sure I respect the candor either, because, does Amodei have any expectation this will persuade ppl in tech? Surely not. Perhaps the actual audience for this is policy makers i…
Shubhendu Trivedi: Over time I have come to the conclusion that a lot of this isn't as much about regulatory capture and becoming a designated economic tollbooth (although there's that too). It's more like they reall…
Open the thread →
4 experts · 6 posts · 13h ago
Matches Policy & governance
“And, again: golf courses and flat lawns and monocropping agribusiness practices are ALSO BAD. *More Than One Thing Can Be Bad*!” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Policy & governance · 1
Damien Williams: I'm reading the "environmentalists are wrong about data centers" piece from the NYT and ohmygoditssofuckingbad. Apparently, so long as you're punching left, they'll just let you say any goddamn thi…
Damien Williams: And, again: golf courses and flat lawns and monocropping agribusiness practices are ALSO BAD. *More Than One Thing Can Be Bad*!
Open the thread →
3 experts · 4 posts · 4h ago
Matches Policy & governance
“Tech companies love to talk about “self regulation.” But self regulation is an oxymoron—it means no regulation. Self regulation is a predicate for Network States & the disabling of democratic socie…” evidence ↗
Shared emphasis Policy & governance · 2
Neil Turkewitz: Tech companies love to talk about “self regulation.” But self regulation is an oxymoron—it means no regulation. Self regulation is a predicate for Network States & the disabling of democratic socie…
Mike Masnick: As much as I cannot stand Musk or xAI... On this I think he's right that this law violates the First Amendment and is preempted by 230. There are other approaches to dealing with NCII and deepfakes.
Open the thread →
3 experts · 4 posts · 9h ago
Matches Policy & governance
“Can we add a "How scared are you of LOSING THE AI ARMS RACE TO CHINA?!?" path to avoid all the pesky regulation discussion” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Policy & governance · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Kate Klonick: Yeah but I should have added "Have you considered an open letter?" under "Do you work for an AI Company"
Jake Laperruque: Can we add a "How scared are you of LOSING THE AI ARMS RACE TO CHINA?!?" path to avoid all the pesky regulation discussion
Open the thread →