Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Questions & unknowns reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Questions & unknowns
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New Agents & robotics Development 9h ago
⚡ 6 h early
Uber reports low AI agent booking adoption

Almost no one uses AI agents to book their Uber, company says | TechCrunch

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Questions & unknowns reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Mark Riedl
“Why would people use AI to book uber trips? It’s not hard to use the UI and you get fine control of where the pickup point is. techcrunch.com/2026/11/04/a...” evidence ↗
2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Mark Riedl Pavel

“Why would people use AI to book uber trips? It’s not hard to use the UI and you get fine control of where the pickup point is. techcrunch.com/2026/11/04/a...”

Primary source techcrunch.com ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 9 posts · 1d ago
SE Gyges Alex Gude
Matches Questions & unknowns
“me: please do x <ten minutes later>: i did, a b and c, which are parts of x, but then didn't do d or e, which are necessary to actually finish doing x. do you want me to do x?” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Markets & investment · 1 Building & implementation · 1
SE Gyges: you can measure how badly my workday has gone by how many times i have typed "did i stutter", exactly that as a whole message by itself with no capitalization, to an llm
SE Gyges: me: please do x <ten minutes later>: i did, a b and c, which are parts of x, but then didn't do d or e, which are necessary to actually finish doing x. do you want me to do x?
Open the thread →