Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Research & technical analysis
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 8 posts · 1d ago
Ted Underwood Eli Sennesh tweety fish Singularity's Bounty e/cc
Matches Research & technical analysis
“whatever secret training software engineers are receiving that allows them to evaluate—and change—previous opinions, it's really something we should consider trying on academics” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Markets & investment · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
Ted Underwood: whatever secret training software engineers are receiving that allows them to evaluate—and change—previous opinions, it's really something we should consider trying on academics
Ted Underwood: it's just very notable that a lot of explicitly AI-skeptical engineers performed a kind of transformation over the last twelve months where they almost "changed," so to speak, "their mind" — though…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 5 posts · 1d ago
Eryk Salvaggio Hagen Blix Tyler Shoemaker
Matches Research & technical analysis
“He organized a dogpile against me and some other AI researchers who wrote a paper against "AGI" because he didn't bother to read it. Dumb would be fine, we don't all have the privilege of education…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Markets & investment · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
Hagen Blix: Yup. 💯 And now he's also selling people on the idea that, ultimately, capitalism will just solve the problem on its own. Take comfort in the market!
Hagen Blix: Come on, it's not like these guys are connected to the US military? It's not like Amodei and Altman are giving speeches about their preferred geopolitical developments to the UN, or giving huge amo…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 9 posts · 1d ago
Olivia Guest Charles Logan
Matches Research & technical analysis
“I mean, I presented a paper at the annual learning sciences conference in 2024 challenging the field to teach about and against GenAI, so I don’t really believe most of my colleagues haven’t heard …” evidence ↗
Charles Logan: Still lolsobbing (but mostly sobbing) that the organizers of my academic field’s annual conference decided to feature AI slop images on the conference homepage 🫠
Charles Logan: Not a good look! 😬
Open the thread →