Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,373 searchable experts 3,451 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New AI research Research 18h ago
PPO STGNN DAG scheduling paper

PPO-STGNN: A Proximal Policy Optimization Approach with Spatio-Temporal Graph Neural Networks for DAG Task Scheduling in Cloud-Edge-End Computing

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 0 communities 1 sources clustered

“PPO-STGNN: A Proximal Policy Optimization Approach with Spatio-Temporal Graph Neural Networks for DAG Task Scheduling in Cloud-Edge-End Computing Yangshuo Qi, Chenwei Wang, Zihan Shen, Songlin Sun https://t.co/v7rZt8qhwf [𝚌𝚜.𝙰𝙸] https://t.co/ilHIcghFSo”

New AI research Analysis 11h ago
AI bioweapons biosecurity warning essay

Newly created viruses are a warning. We still have a window to stop AI-enabled bioweapons

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 0 communities 1 sources clustered

“"We have a window of opportunity to build the layered system of defense we need now, before AI-enabled bioweapons capabilities become undeniably advanced—or worse, demonstrably effective." https://t.co/UH41Ld2taJ”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 3 posts · 1d ago
samuel mehr: I got a text from an academic who's sure the editorial rejection they received, from a v good journal that I also publish in and review for, is AI-written, or at least heavily AI-edited. I read the…
Ben Williamson: Awful. We have specific text in our invites to reviewers reminding them that it is unacceptable to feed unpublished manuscripts into commercial LLM platforms.
Open the thread →