Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,365 searchable experts 2,967 tracked across all sources
Clear

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; expert reactions remain attributable.

New AI research Signal 4h ago

Practical Coreset Constructions for Machine Learning

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“This problem is called "coreset selection" in ML. Methods generally depend on choice of target quantity, but presumably if you are willing to select survey measures you can choose those. Some randomly chosen lit reviews: arxiv.org/abs/1703.06476 arxiv.org/a…”

New AI research Research 15h ago
⚡ 5 h early
equivariance at scale paper

Does equivariance matter at scale?

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered

“Does physical modeling matter or should we just do data-driven stuff? I feel like this paper characterizes things perfectly: arxiv.org/abs/2410.23179. Physics-based modeling is always helpful but the relative gain closes at scale”

New AI research Development 4h ago
China regulates AI relationships

China is trying to regulate relationships with AI – can it work? | New Scientist

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“China is trying to regulate how we have relationships with AI over concerns it's affecting society - but will it work? My latest for @newscientist.com www.newscientist.com/article/2580...”

New AI research Signal 13h ago

Lipschitz Continuity in Deep Learning: A Systematic Review of Theoretical Foundations, Estimation Methods, Regularization Approaches, and Certifiable Robustness

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“A vital review on Lipschitz continuity in deep learning highlights its role in enhancing model robustness and generalization. By integrating various approaches, this work is key for creating trustworthy AI systems facing sensitivity and scalability challeng…”

New AI research Analysis 23h ago
⚡ 345 h early
Leiden Declaration AI and mathematics

Leiden Declaration on Artificial Intelligence and Mathematics

14 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

14 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered

“Do read the whole thing, think about your personal and professional values, and how they can serve as strong grounds for resistance and refusal. leidendeclaration.ai”

“Weeks ago, @chanda.blacksky.app sent me this declaration, written and signed by a bunch of mathematicians. But I only had time to read it yesterday, which ended up being right on time given a new round of hype falling exactly under the patterns this documen…”

New AI research Resource 23h ago
claude-scholar academic research tool

GitHub - yy/claude-scholar: Academic research tools for Claude Code — literature search, citation management, LaTeX checks, math verification, and submission preparation

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“I think that's exactly what many skills are about. Many of github.com/yy/claude-sc... are basically such checklists to go through.”

2 experts discussed this · 35 posts
Cat Hicks: "Scientists who use AI are morons who aren't reading" I'm a computational social scientist and I feel like LLMs are a lot of things, but one thing they can be is a computational tool for text-based…
Cat Hicks: I am interesting in improving a measure of motivation on software teams I've been using. I open up an open access paper that did some pretty deep item development in a student population, itself sc…
Cat Hicks: I am reading it myself. but in parallel I also opened up claude and invoked a pdf reading skill (which saves notes per page to my working folder). I read the paper myself, then I review the LLM not…
Open the full discussion →
Developing AI research Analysis 1d ago
Scientists resist giving AI their joy

Don’t let AI steal all the joy: what scientists won’t give up to chatbots

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“This short piece is lining up with where I think we might see science and AI head. I envision AI use evolving more as a customized toolsets, instead of a one size fits all approachl. Give the AI work they tend to avoid, but reserve the elements they relish …”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 45 posts · 1d ago
Pwnallthethings: This is going to be a big deal, but easy to get the wrong end of the stick on it. So I think it's worth breaking down what actually happened, why, and what it actually means, based on the public in…
Pwnallthethings: Upfront tl;dr: a model at OAI hacked out of a constrained environment inside OAI and hacked a *different* company autonomously, without authorization from any human in order to creatively solve a t…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 6 posts · 15h ago
suhr: I'm somehow reviewing the "neuroscience and cognitive science" track at NeurIPS and it's incredible what bullshit AI/ML researchers can come up with when they read Wikipedia articles about the (sti…
suhr: I fear that if psychology was already in a scientific crisis it will be uncritically torpedoed into whatever becomes of my research field
Open the thread →
2 experts · 5 posts · 1d ago
Casey Fiesler: A common Q I get on social media is: how do I get into tech/AI ethics as a field/for a job? I would love some help with this! What is some helpful advice here that (a) is not about academia or even…
Casey Fiesler: What kinds of jobs would you point folks to after that?
Open the thread →