"if the youths hate ai so much, why do half of them use it at least weekly?" "if people hate their jobs so much, why do they go there every day?" gee, i don't know, must be some kind of special reason people do things they profess to dislike. humans are famously 100% cognitive accordant
if you didn’t write it… you didn’t write it no, using an llm to “draft” for you is not writing it writers write: that’s one of the four noble truths for writers if you don’t write, you’re not a writer it’s really that simple no wriggling, hairsplitting, whining argument will change that
the ai coding crybullies never survived a usenet os/editor/language war and it shows some people online don’t like the tools you’re using? SO WHAT? either stop or suck it up
here's what i think is weird and gross about llm boosters: so, you use it. it works for you. okay? and? i would no more try to talk someone else into using an llm than i would talk someone else into using photoshop i don't understand the impulse, and find it inherently suspect
thomas: i can’t believe people are complaining that the ai watermarking will affect “meaning.” ai text has no meaning me: right?? if you care about word choice, you’re not using an llm. ipso facto, bitches and that’s why i love leisurely mornings over coffee with my husband
i want to read something on why llms focus so much on weird ~ceremonial~ uses of nouns and verbs, freighting them with meaning they don't have, and using them like thought-terminating clichés. it's not just awkward. and i'd say there's very little real-world sample data to cause this.