Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Adverb ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Models & releases Research 16d ago
⚡ 6 h early
generative diffusion outputs unattributable paper

Outputs of generative diffusion models are often unattributable - Nature Communications

3 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

3 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Aram Sinnreich Andres Guadamuz Adverb

“This paper feels massive for some image lawsuits specifically, and I wonder if it can be replicated with text. If you remove an artist from a model, the output will remain the same. www.nature.com/articles/s41...”

Primary source nature.com ↗