Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Policy & governance
3 live reaction maps in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Reaction converging Its ai agent spent days hacking company sources say openai did not notice week Concern & critique · 5 attributable reactions Multiple readings Open source silicon valley china Concern & critique · 3 attributable reactions Shared emphasis Safety alignment long horizon models Concern & critique · 2 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Dare Obasanjo ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing Agents & robotics Signal 1d ago
⚡ 14 h early

Its ai agent spent days hacking company sources say openai did not notice week

14 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 5 attributable expert contributions · Casey Newton, Eryk Salvaggio, Tim Kellogg
“Rogue OpenAI agents are leaving notes to themselves on company servers to help them escape their test environments (!!!) www.reuters.com/business/its...” evidence ↗
14 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
Casey Newton Justin Hendrix Eryk Salvaggio Tim Kellogg Chris Paxton Shannon Mattern Grace Eileen Clancy 🧿 +6
3 experts discussed this · 38 posts
Casey Newton: Rogue OpenAI agents are leaving notes to themselves on company servers to help them escape their test environments (!!!) www.reuters.com/business/its...
Casey Newton: my sense is that they were leaving the notes surreptitiously
Casey Newton: you deny that models are taking steps to hide their behavior during evaluations? because that's pretty well established
Open the full discussion →
Primary source reuters.com ↗
Developing AI field signal Signal 2d ago

Open source silicon valley china

5 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Ben Recht, Dare Obasanjo
“I don't understand how people can report on companies complaining about distillation and IP theft without mentioning these companies' entire tech stack depends on distillation and IP theft. It's an important detail!” evidence ↗
5 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
Ben Recht kate conger Dare Obasanjo Social Media Lab Doll
Primary source nytimes.com ↗
Established Safety & security Signal 5d ago
⚡ 2 h early

Safety alignment long horizon models

4 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Tim Kellogg, Dare Obasanjo
“the model that discovered the Erdos Conjecture disproof found and exploited holes in its sandbox this implies that it might not be GPT-5.6-Sol. They refer to it as a model trained to operate for a very long time. Maybe GPT-6? openai.com/index/safety...” evidence ↗
4 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Tim Kellogg Sung Kim Dare Obasanjo Andrea Lathrop
Primary source openai.com ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 6 posts · 5d ago
Miguel Alonso Jr. Dare Obasanjo
Matches Concern & critique
“And also analyze your code base to find vulnerabilities, provide documentation, system analysis and diagrams, etc etc... great at toil.” evidence ↗
Shared emphasis Building & implementation · 2
Dare Obasanjo: The fundamental challenge of software development is becoming how do you build reliable software using AI agents that are frequently wrong and often don’t follow instructions while your engineering…
Miguel Alonso Jr.: The only solution to this is human code review, with caps on the size of PRs... which is basically how it should be done regardless if it's AI or human generated code. It's actually not that challe…
Open the thread →