Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Clear
Showing signals surfaced by Singularity's Bounty e/cc ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; expert reactions remain attributable.

Established Evaluation & benchmarks Resource 4d ago
principle benchmark human edition release

Principle benchmark — human edition

3 experts are actively discussing the implications.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Singularity's Bounty e/cc

“I'm not going to respond directly to the nay-sayers, but I wrote a benchmark to test reasoning My intention was to make it falsifiable, and see how the models did at extracting a structure-preserving compression then applying it (one example then the model …”

3 experts discussed this · 6 posts
Ryan Moulton: holy shit jacobian conjecture down with a hand checkable counterexample
David Marx: It being posted on twitter does not render it unreliable. It was posted by the account of a notable mathematician. It satisfies WP:RS. Fun fact: the primary citation for RMSprop is a powerpoint sli…
David Marx: I am obligated to defend this hill as a member of the few, the proud: the tweet-cited. bsky.app/profile/digt...
Open the full discussion →
Primary source yuwakisa.com ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 6 posts · 1d ago
Ryan Moulton Arseny Khakhalin Singularity's Bounty e/cc
Ryan Moulton: AI denial does function well as a low stakes tracer dye for how much groupthink is in a community. If you see a high frequency of afflicted people, that community hasn't ingested any info other tha…
Ryan Moulton: If they're that blinkered about what their computer can do, imagine how they react about anything that actually has real emotional stakes for them.
Open the thread →
2 experts · 9 posts · 1d ago
Eugene Vinitsky Singularity's Bounty e/cc
Eugene Vinitsky: Has a chess player ever tried to beat a model by learning to mimic a best response to the model? Doesn‘t seem impossible?
Eugene Vinitsky: It’s obviously uninteresting in the single model case since they presumably have deterministic exploits but maybe there’s a transferable strategy. Platonic hypothesis of chess models or something
Open the thread →