It's useful to anthropomorphize the models - Peter Van Dijck's homepage
1 directory member surfaced this signal.
Join free with your email
Free. No spam, ever — we'll never share your email address and you can opt out at any time. Already a subscriber? Log in
What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.
Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.
No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.
One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.
1 directory member surfaced this signal.
2 directory members surfaced this signal.
“A longpost in spirit, ejected to leaflet: "Why anthropomorphize language models?" https://leaflet.pub/p/did:plc:p572wxnsuoogcrhlfrlizlrb/3mvwboivmjs2c”
3 experts are actively discussing the implications.
“And that's important. Have you seen my "Principles" benchmark? I very intentionally included physical embodiment questions, as well as emotional questions, to see how the models did on questions they can not experience yuwakisa.com/benchmarks/p...”
7 experts are actively discussing the implications.
“Honestly, the easiest thing is to fire up Clade Code in a directory, and tell it you want a gpt-2 size model to train. It will walk you through the whole thing Also Karpathy 🙌 has a video here that walks through it www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8pR...”