Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Singularity's Bounty e/cc ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing Evaluation & benchmarks Resource 1d ago
principle benchmark human edition release

Principle benchmark — human edition

3 experts are actively discussing the implications.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“And that's important. Have you seen my "Principles" benchmark? I very intentionally included physical embodiment questions, as well as emotional questions, to see how the models did on questions they can not experience yuwakisa.com/benchmarks/p...”

3 experts discussed this · 6 posts
Ryan Moulton: holy shit jacobian conjecture down with a hand checkable counterexample
David Marx: It being posted on twitter does not render it unreliable. It was posted by the account of a notable mathematician. It satisfies WP:RS. Fun fact: the primary citation for RMSprop is a powerpoint sli…
David Marx: I am obligated to defend this hill as a member of the few, the proud: the tweet-cited. bsky.app/profile/digt...
Open the full discussion →
Established AI field signal Signal 4d ago

Let's reproduce GPT-2 (124M)

7 experts are actively discussing the implications.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“Honestly, the easiest thing is to fire up Clade Code in a directory, and tell it you want a gpt-2 size model to train. It will walk you through the whole thing Also Karpathy 🙌 has a video here that walks through it www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8pR...”

7 experts discussed this · 20 posts
Eugene Vinitsky: LLMs are closer to grown than designed. This is what people mean when they say we don’t ”understand” them nor can ”control” them
e.w. niedermeyer: if only there were some kind of precedent that might allow us to wrangle with this! us.macmillan.com/books/978125...
tachikoma: well there is the Boltzmann brain (theorized at least)
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

7 experts · 93 posts · 1d ago
Reaction converging Questions & unknowns · 3 Opportunity & adoption · 1
Doll: A serious weakness in the “sufficiently intelligent AI inevitably wages war on humanity” story is that it needs to explain why conquest beats purchasing, contracting, and participating.
Doll: Violence creates resistance, destroys useful assets, interrupts supply chains, and makes everyone spend resources defending against you. Cooperation lets you benefit from capabilities you never had…
Open the thread →
8 experts · 33 posts · 6d ago
Multiple readings Questions & unknowns · 2 Concern & critique · 1 Building & implementation · 1
Mark Riedl: Do openAI and Anthropic employees not understand how computers work.
Mark Riedl: Any competent IT professional: Hey boss, what is this 8TB file doing on our server, and why is it executing continuously on 3TB of VRAM? Any competent IT manager: what ever it is, shut it down.
Open the thread →