Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Damien Williams ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Safety & security Signal 3d ago

Anthropic quietly pitches its own ai safety bill lawmakers politico reports

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“Remember when we said that all the fear-hype and "AI slowdown/pause/pacing/whatever" talk was just a way for them to set up regulatory capture via paradigmatic capture? Told you so. But I mean, this was really quite obvious. Attempts at regulatory capture f…”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 5 posts · 5d ago
Damien Williams: …At the same time, I absolutely have been trained to crave that citation count like the goat craves the mineral, and let me tell you, that particular mismatch is Misery-making.
Damien Williams: oh well. the way it goes sometimes. Still not square with the fact that the way I measure impact & the way i've been forced by disciplinary strictures to measure impact are fundamentally at odds, t…
Open the thread →