Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Hypervisible ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 10d ago
⚡ 15 h early

Ai slop books biography amazon

11 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Sarah T Roberts, PhD, Woodrow Hartzog
““As economists, they told me, they’re less concerned with literary quality or customer satisfaction than revenue growth and market expansion.” You don’t say.” evidence ↗
11 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
3 experts discussed this · 12 posts
Kashmir Hill: Got this text a couple months. Had to investigate it. www.nytimes.com/2026/07/16/t...
Salomé Viljoen: Got this text a couple months. Had to investigate it. www.nytimes.com/2026/07/16/t...
Kashmir Hill: To quote myself... "My biography was no 'Fifty Shades.' The only punishing part was reading it."
Open the full discussion →
Established AI field signal Signal 15d ago

One sci fis most difficult questions about ai is becoming real

3 experts are actively discussing the implications.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Hypervisible
“The argument laid out in the article is basically that holding ai companies liable for the harm their products cause will stifle innovation 🙄” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“The argument laid out in the article is basically that holding ai companies liable for the harm their products cause will stifle innovation 🙄”

3 experts discussed this · 5 posts
Hypervisible : The argument laid out in the article is basically that holding ai companies liable for the harm their products cause will stifle innovation 🙄
Hypervisible : Holding the appliance company liable when the faulty toaster electrocutes you will unfairly hamper toaster innovation.
Eryk Salvaggio: My favorite (perhaps not intended) line in this is “AI researchers concerned about the dangers of hypothetical super-intelligent AIs that escape human control say stricter liability rules would for…
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 10 posts · 11d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“This morning my AI powered fitness band was like “why don’t you go for a run??” and I was like “actually dangerous air quality” and it was like “good decision!!” Anyway do not take health advice fr…” evidence ↗
Christopher Mims: This morning my AI powered fitness band was like “why don’t you go for a run??” and I was like “actually dangerous air quality” and it was like “good decision!!” Anyway do not take health advice fr…
Hypervisible : This morning my AI powered fitness band was like “why don’t you go for a run??” and I was like “actually dangerous air quality” and it was like “good decision!!” Anyway do not take health advice fr…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 12 posts · 13d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“are you sure there isn't a facial unlock system on luxury cars already? a lot of times surveillance is sold as a luxury @hypervisible.blacksky.app is in fact working on a book about this called "Lu…” evidence ↗
Anthony Moser: this is what i mean when i say ai is a rhetorical technology. functionally this is a tool for *justifying deportation*, not a tool for assessing age. when someone is pitching an ai product, don't a…
Anthony Moser: So let's apply that here. what does this justify?
Open the thread →