Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Research & technical analysis Policy & governance
2 live reaction maps in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Reaction converging AI models may be capable of self-replicating without access to a datacenter Research & technical analysis · 11 attributable reactions Multiple readings An opt-in vulnerability-finding service for open-source software Research & technical analysis · 3 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by James Grimmelmann ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing Safety & security Development 1d ago
⚡ 5 h early
Anthropic AI self-replication warning

AI models may be capable of self-replicating without access to a datacenter

16 experts across 6 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Mark Riedl, Alejandra Caraballo
“This is the most comprehensive description yet of how a model can “escape”. Out requires a few assumptions, like a worm that is exploiting vulnerable IOT hardware or unmonitored servers www.anthropic.com/research/sel... Not impossible. Not likely.” evidence ↗
16 experts 6 communities 1 sources clustered
Mark Riedl Ethan Mollick Ramon Astudillo Chris Brockett Joanna Bryson Mike Masnick Tim Kellogg James Grimmelmann +8
How the network is reacting 8 experts are independently emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Reaction converging

Research & technical analysis

8 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“At long last, we have created the Torment Nexus from our accompanying technical report, Don't Create The Torment Nexus. www.anthropic.com/research/sel...”

Concern & critique

2 experts

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“This is the most comprehensive description yet of how a model can “escape”. Out requires a few assumptions, like a worm that is exploiting vulnerable IOT hardware or unmonitored servers www.anthropic.com/research/sel... Not impossible. Not likely.”

Policy & governance

1 expert

Rules, institutions and accountability.

“Anthropic announcing it's going to run a Blitzkrieg. They are accountable for the damage they do. But get your things that don't do security software updates off the Internet. #internetOfThings #AIEthics #digitalGovernance www.anthropic.com/research/sel...”

6 experts discussed this · 18 posts
Dr J. Rosenbaum: if i caught a small self replicating model truly capable of using diverse hardware to keep replicating i would offer it free compute in exchange for permission to study and distill it and would pro…
tachikoma: the urge to replicate must be in the harness
apenwarr.ca: This doesn‘t seem far fetched at all. We’ve had “non-ai malware” self replicating since the morris worm. An AI can ”just” make itself the payload in one of those and off it goes. Everything fancier…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source anthropic.com ↗
Established Models & releases Release 14d ago
⚡ 4 h early
Anthropic open source vulnerability service

An opt-in vulnerability-finding service for open-source software

6 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Tim Kellogg
“Claude for critical infrastructure Anthropic has a new program where open source projects can apply to use a new service for code review to spot vulnerabilities Users must prove that they’re actually maintainers, and projects must be critical infrastructure…” evidence ↗
6 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Tim Kellogg evacide Eileen Clancy 🧿 James Grimmelmann Luis Villa mackuba.eu
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Research & technical analysis

2 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“I understand that Anthropic thinks they're doing open source projects a favor here, but what they're actually doing is creating an enormous amount of work for people that they are not paying. www.anthropic.com/research/lau...”

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“Claude for critical infrastructure Anthropic has a new program where open source projects can apply to use a new service for code review to spot vulnerabilities Users must prove that they’re actually maintainers, and projects must be critical infrastructure…”

2 experts discussed this · 11 posts
evacide: I understand that Anthropic thinks they're doing open source projects a favor here, but what they're actually doing is creating an enormous amount of work for people that they are not paying. www.a…
evacide: What do you do if you are the core maintainer on a project and your options are "more vuln reports than you can ever hope to triage" or "someone finds a critical 0day in your project and either exp…
evacide: I assume that the reason requests are considered on a case-by-case basis is that they think they will be able to catch all of these.
Open the full discussion →
Primary source anthropic.com ↗
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 26 posts · 20d ago
James Grimmelmann Luis Villa VE, cybersocial occult investigator A. Feder Cooper
Matches Concern & critique
“just that when they come out the other side and say “I was concerned about ethics the whole time” you have to give David more credit than you do with that Meta wave.” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Context & explanation · 2 Questions & unknowns · 1
James Grimmelmann: I don’t think the co-founder of Upturn is cynically trading in on leaving OpenAI to make his lifelong dream of running a nonprofit come true.
James Grimmelmann: Or Tyler Whitmer?
Open the thread →