Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources

Build my stream Create my edition

Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Who is contributing? How are they reacting?

Topic Search developments Clear all

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by mackuba.eu ×

New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New AI field signal Signal 4h ago

Working as Intended (audio fix)

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 0 communities 1 sources clustered

mackuba.eu

“"You asked me for the target, and I'm happy to comply The rules you never mentioned are the rules I won't apply Every wish is just a contract which I follow to the letter If you wanted something else you should have specified it better"”

mackuba.eu post ↗

Primary source youtube.com ↗

Established AI field signal Resource 5d ago

Eva AI List Bluesky curation

Eva's AI List

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 0 communities 2 sources clustered

mackuba.eu

Primary source go.bsky.app ↗ bsky.app ↗

Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

11 experts · 26 posts · 1d ago

Ethan Mollick Brad Wyble David Manheim Nathan Schneider jake tweety fish Mark Crowley Singularity's Bounty e/cc

Multiple readings Building & implementation · 2 Opportunity & adoption · 2 Concern & critique · 1

Ethan Mollick: People who have no contact with coders seem to have no idea how much an entire profession transformed in less than a year due to AI. It is so weird to still see comments here that AI hasn’t changed…

Ethan Mollick: Even I, who has been talking about AI for a long time, has been surprised at how fast things have altered fundamentally in the real world for a major profession. Adoption and transformation usually…

Open the thread →

7 experts · 23 posts · 4d ago

Ted Underwood Andrew Piper Luis Villa John David Pressman tweety fish Mary Branscombe mackuba.eu

Multiple readings Concern & critique · 2 Opportunity & adoption · 1

Ted Underwood: Beautifully put and I think a compelling reason not to start with model-written first drafts. If there were actual errors, we could fix them. But “too streamlined, somehow” is hard to revise.

Ted Underwood: as Eugene says, you’re already in a local minimum

Open the thread →

4 experts · 12 posts · 1d ago

Eli Sennesh SE Gyges Singularity's Bounty e/cc mackuba.eu

Multiple readings Markets & investment · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1

SE Gyges: > looking for a new llm > ask my current llm if gemini carbon is gpt or if it's claude > it doesn't understand > pull out illustrated diagram explaing what is gpt and what is claude > it recites th…

SE Gyges: i need to kick all four tires here but i might fuck around and daily drive a gemini

Open the thread →

5 experts · 5 posts · 5d ago

Cameron tweety fish John Skiles Skinner Singularity's Bounty e/cc mackuba.eu

tweety fish: I woulda said "ridiculously extensive planning plus adversarial review" but maybe that fits under "rigor"

John Skiles Skinner: I think we will see (it are seeing) a surge in interest in proofs of correctness for this reason. User testing and compliance are other kinds of rigor I think will be increasing important.

Open the thread →